|Printable version||E-mail this to a friend|
Militant trade unionism blocking public service revolution
Former Downing St. aide says state monopoly on public services must be swept away
Politicians must stand up to militant trade unionists, including banning the right to strike for emergency workers, to truly deliver a wholesale revolution in the way public services are delivered.
In his first report since leaving Downing Street, Sean Worth says that powerful vested interests at the top of the trade union movement has led to a lack of productivity and quality in our public services that affects the most vulnerable members of society such as children and the elderly.
The report, Better Public Services: A Roadmap for Revolution, calls for a number of changes in the way services are delivered which puts power firmly in the hands of the public. It argues that the state’s right to monopoly provision of public services should be swept aside. Private companies and voluntary groups should be able to compete in an open and transparent process to provide services to the public. A new legal right would be established giving people the right to exercise choice in the public services they consumer.
Citing findings from a new YouGov poll commissioned alongside the report, Worth says that vested interests in the health service, including the ‘old boys network’ in the Royal Colleges and the BMA, have convinced many in the media that the public do not want private companies to deliver public services. However, evidence shows that people overwhelmingly want greater choice and competition:
1 in 5 parents (22%) – rising to 1 in 3 living in cities- felt they had no options to access a good school in their local area.
60% of people thought that if a school, GP surgery or NHS dentist was providing a poor service then business and charities should be brought in to run them either via expanding choice or taking over the management of existing services
C2 (skilled working class) voters were the most in favour of allowing businesses/charities to run services (65%).
The report also recommends:
Online comparison sites should be contracted by the government to produce simple league tables to allow people to compare the performance of local hospitals. GPs and care homes.
An end to ‘postcode lotteries’ which are unfair for poorer families
Sean Worth, author of the report, “As Mrs Thatcher and Tony Blair showed, taking on reactionary elites requires concerted political effort. It’s time to put the public first. People should be able to compare, choose and switch services from an open field of providers. In turn, the machinery of government must shed outdated biases and embrace competition for the force of social good.
“The income gap between rich and poor widened to record levels by 2010, a failure not just specific policies or departments in government but the failure of a whole public sector policy paradigm, based around centrally controlled services delivered by the state. A new approach is needed which allows business and charities to compete on a level playing field, driving up the standard of healthcare and education available to the British public.”