HUSBAND & WIFE FRAUDSTERS IN THE DOCK AFTER SPENDING SPREE

16 Aug 2005 12:45 PM

A Leeds couple who ripped off local businesses by writing fraudulent cheques have been sentenced at Bradford Crown Court after a successful DTI prosecution.

Tina Patel, 28, was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment and her husband Davindra, 29, received a two year community rehabilitation order after they pleaded guilty to setting up a company while bankrupt, obtaining a hire vehicle by deception and twelve other offences of obtaining property by deception. They were also banned from acting as directors for seven years.

The pair had been declared bankrupt on 24th June 2002 but set up Ironmade Distribution Limited, and acted as directors even though their bankruptcies barred them from doing this. When Tina Patel attended the Official Receiver's office she deliberately concealed that she had started a new company and was acting as a director.

Tina Patel used a stolen chequebook to make fraudulent purchases leaving local businesses out of pocket. Mrs Patel used one of the stolen cheques to hire a car; she then went on a spending spree, writing forged cheques for more than £22,000, which were not honoured by the bank.

In sentencing Tina Patel the judge stated that the offences, some of which were committed on bail, were so serious that only an immediate custodial sentence could be justified.

Tina Patel's sentence also included a custodial sentence for two separate offences of evading liability by deception, obtaining services by deception and theft and false accounting prosecuted by the CPS.

Notes to Editors

1. Business suppliers that were ripped off by Tina Patel and Ironmade Distribution Limited supplied a range of toiletries, greetings cards and fancy goods and were based in Bradford, Bristol and Rochdale.

2. Tina Patel was sentenced for 14 counts upon the DTI's prosecution to 6 months imprisonment, each to run concurrently. She was also disqualified from acting as a company director for seven years.

3. Davindra Patel was sentenced to 2 years Community Rehabilitation Order and seven years disqualification upon the DTI's prosecution under s11 of the Company Director's Disqualification Act 1986 (see point 4 below).

4. Tina Patel was sentenced to twelve months upon two separate prosecutions by the CPS, one of thee and one of nine months.

5. To act as a director of, or directly or indirectly to take part in or be concerned in the promotion, formation or management of a company, except with the leave of the court, whilst an undischarged bankrupt, is an offence contrary to s11 of the Company Director's Disqualification Act 1985.

6. Making a material omission in a statement under s291 Insolvency Act 1986 relating to your affairs is an offence contrary to s356(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986.

7. Obtaining property by deception is an offence contrary to s15(1) of the Theft Act 1968

8. Obtaining services by deception is an offence contrary to s1(1) of the Theft Act 1978.

9. The Insolvency Service is an executive agency of the Department of Trade and Industry. Its official receivers have responsibility for the administration and investigation of bankruptcies and companies that are put into liquidation by Order of the Court.

10. Where Official Receivers discover conduct by bankrupts that might constitute a criminal offence, the matters are reported to the Department of Trade and Industry Legal Services (Prosecution) branch with a view to the investigation and prosecution of any offences, where appropriate.

For further information about the Insolvency Service and disqualification see www.insolvency.gov.uk

Department of Trade and Industry

7th Floor
1 Victoria Street
London SW1H 0ET
Public Enquiries +44 (0)20 7215 5000
Textphone +44 (0)20 7215 6740
(for those with hearing impairment)
www.dti.gov.uk