APPROVAL FOR DISINFECTANTS USED AGAINST BOVINE TB WITHDRAWN
5 Dec 2000 12:00 AM
Seven disinfectants approved for use against bovine tuberculosis are
being removed from the list of approved products. Routine check
testing by MAFF has shown six of these not to be fully effective at
the approved dilution rate and one is no longer manufactured.
Following these test results, MAFF has undertaken further
investigations of all disinfectants approved for use against bovine
TB and currently marketed. These were tested by the Veterinary
Laboratories Agency and a significant number have been found to be
ineffective at the approved dilution.
We have written today to the manufacturers of these further products
advising them that they have three weeks in which to make
representations concerning these results. As soon as possible
assessment of such representations will be made and any necessary
regulatory action taken.
Notes to Editors
1. Approval for statutory use against bovine tuberculosis is being
removed from the following products with effect from 6 December
2000 by means of an Amendment Order amending the Diseases of
Animals (Approved Disinfectants) Order 1978: Kleencare DS680;
Trigene II, Genie 11, Killgerm PX-Parvo II, Hycolin and Genus
Universal. Zal Universal, which is no longer manufactured, is also
removed from the list of MAFF approved disinfectants. One new
product, Genus Universal - New Formulation, is approved for use
against TB and other categories.
2. MAFF carries out routine check testing of disinfectants
approved for use for statutory disease control purposes against
various animal diseases, including TB, under the Diseases of
Animals (Approved Disinfectants) Order 1978. In addition to the
changes listed above, the approvals for Arrow Vibac and Vibacide
are removed for use against Swine Vesicular Disease and the
dilution rate at which Kleencare DS680 may be used against
diseases of poultry is amended. Any other categories for statutory
use, for which these disinfectants are approved, are retained.
3. Disinfectants are required to be used for statutory disease
control by State Veterinary Service field staff, farmers,
livestock market operators and hauliers in disinfecting protective
clothing and footwear and hard surfaces such as cattle pens and
vehicles used for transporting livestock. MAFF approves
disinfectants for use in these circumstances.
4. Over one hundred and forty disinfectants are approved for use
against TB of which sixty-two are distinct products with different
formulations - so-called ''parent'' disinfectants. Of these
sixty-two, current test results suggest that seventeen are
effective, twenty-nine are not effective while sixteen are no
longer manufactured. No information is held by the Government on
the market share of the products concerned.
END