<h2>Hi</h2>
8 Mar 2011 11:58 AM
Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions - Part 1 Report

News Release issued by the COI News Distribution Service on 08 March 2011

Issued by the News Distribution Service on behalf of the Independent Police Pay and Conditions Review.

Radical overhaul of police pay recommended.

The results of the first part of a comprehensive review of police pay and conditions designed to improve service for the public and maximise value for money were published today.

The independent study, commissioned by Home Secretary Theresa May in October, will help bring modern management practices into policing and increase operational flexibility for the country's 43 territorial forces.

The review was led by former Rail Regulator Tom Winsor, a partner at global law firm White &amp; Case. He was supported by former West Midlands Chief Constable Sir Edward Crew and leading labour market economist Professor Richard Disney.

The review found that police officers are comparatively well paid, 10 to 15 per cent higher than some other emergency workers and the armed forces, as well as up to 60 per cent higher than the average local earnings in regions such as Wales and the North East.

In the short term, Tom Winsor recommends that a power to make officers compulsorily redundant is not necessary. This makes police officers unique in the public sector and this protection comes at a price, namely:

* suspension of all chief officer and superintendent bonuses;
* abolition of the £1,212 Competence-Related Threshold Payment (CRTP);
* abolition of the discredited Special Priority Payments (SPP), of up to £5,000;
* freezing progression up the pay scale for two years for all officers and staff; and
* savings of up to £60 million in the annual overtime budget.

Introducing the report, lead reviewer Tom Winsor said:

"I have always had immense respect for police officers and staff and the vital work they do. Every day those on the frontline can face difficult and dangerous situations and throughout this review, I have been guided by the overriding principle of fairness - fairness to individual police officers and staff, and fairness to the taxpayer.

"These recommendations will allow the police to provide a more efficient, economical and effective service to the public while providing officers and staff with a fairer pay deal.

"People should be paid for what they do and how well they do it and the service needs modern management tools to operate with the greatest efficiency and economy in a time of considerable national financial pressure and restraint."

The projected savings and costs arising from this review suggest that if implemented from September 2011, these recommendations will produce net savings of £485 million over three years.

Other key recommendations include the reinvestment of £635 million targeted at the frontline, including:

* officers who work unsocial hours should receive an extra 10 per cent of their basic pay on an hourly rate (between 8pm and 6am). This will primarily benefit frontline public-facing roles and operational specialists; and
* a new Expertise and Professional Accreditation Allowance of £1,200 for most detectives, firearms, public order and neighbourhood policing officers

The following principles have been applied in the development of this review's recommendations:

* fairness is an essential part of any new system of pay and conditions;
* the office of constable is the bedrock of British policing;
* the demands of policing - full and proper weight must be given to the particular and onerous demands which their occupation places on police officers and their families;
* people should be paid for what they do, the skills they have and are applying in their work, and the weights of the jobs they do;
* people should be paid for how well they work;
* a single police service - distinctions in pay and other conditions of service between police officers and police staff should be objectively justified having regard to the conditions which exist today, not on the basis of history or tradition;
* simple to implement and administer - the review's recommendations should not unjustifiably add to the bureaucratic burden on individuals and police forces; and
* phased introduction - some reforms should be introduced over time, so that police officers and police staff do not feel threatened and the system has time to adjust.

Notes to editors

1. The Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions - Part 1 Report can be found here: http://review.police.uk The Review is due to report in two stages; short term recommendations have been published today and long term recommendations will be published in June.

2. Tom Winsor is a partner in White &amp; Case, the global law firm. He was the Rail Regulator between 1999 and 2004, which included the period of dismantling Railtrack and the creation of Network Rail. In his period in office he carried out two major reviews of the national railway infrastructure (October 2000 and December 2003), and helped reform the industry. Since 2004, he has been a partner in global law firm White &amp; Case in its City of London office. He qualified as a lawyer in 1981.

3. Sir Edward Crew was Chief Constable of West Midlands Police from 1996 to 2002 and Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police from 1993 to 1996. He had been a serving officer for more than 40 years when he retired in 2002.

4. Richard Disney is Professor of Labour Economics at Nottingham University. He has also worked at the Universities of London, Kent and Canterbury, Reading, Strathclyde and Addis Ababa. He is a Research Fellow of the Institute for Fiscal Studies and has worked with the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

5. The Review covered both police officers and civilian staff, including Police Community Support Officers.

6. For further details please contact Zoe Paxton on 020 7035 3823.


Contacts:

NDS Enquiries
Phone: For enquiries please contact the issuing dept
ndsenquiries@coi.gsi.gov.uk