CIVITAS - EU membership is compromising UK national security
• Military integration of EU is undermining interoperability with Nato and the US
• European nations' low defence spending and reluctance to deploy bodes ill for Britain
• UK should seek to obtain a favourable exit deal as part of next EU treaty negotiations
Download With Friends Like These... Why Britain should leave the EU - and how, here.
Britain's security is being imperilled by its membership of the European Union, a new Civitas publication argues. The reluctance of many European states to deploy military force and their low levels of defence spending are compromising the UK's position, professorial research fellow David Conway says.
While the status quo - allowing Britain to maintain its defence alliance with the US and Nato - suits Britain, that is being undermined by the continued military integration of the EU. UK security would be better served by withdrawing from the EU, Conway writes.
"Should it ever have to choose between America or EU membership, its security would be better served by continuing its alliance with America than by remaining an EU member," he writes in With Friends Like These... Why Britain should leave the EU - and how.
"In practice, Britain's security is becoming ever more compromised by its continued membership of an EU that is beginning to become more integrated militarily."
Conway argues that Britain's external security would be better served by its withdrawing from the EU and pursuing its defence collaboration with other European states, or through Nato, or bilaterally.
The more integrated EU states' military capabilities become, the more reliant they are for security on the EU and less able to deploy unilaterally.
"Any greater reliance on the EU could well jeopardise Britain's security because, apart from France and a couple of other member states, Britain's EU partners have consistently shown themselves to be less willing to expend public money on defence.
"The reluctance of so many EU member states to deploy military force bodes ill for Britain, especially if EU defence integration means that Britain will increasingly have to look to the EU for security rather than depend on its own capabilities or those of America."
Conway's warning of defence is part of a wide-ranging survey of Britain's relationship with the EU which says the UK has lost out both economically and politically by being a member.
"Britain and its people would be able to enjoy more freedom, justice, democracy, as well as greater prosperity, were it to leave the EU."
Conway backs a future UK-EU relationship dubbed 'EEA lite', which would see Britain leave the EU but remain part of the European Economic Area. Britain would then be able to negotiate free trade deals with other countries, and would not be subject to EU directives and regulations (apart from those pertaining to trade with the EU). Crucially, EU interference in British law and justice would be negated, and Britain would be able to repeal whichever laws it wished.
By way of an exit strategy, he proposes Britain should wait until the negotiations over the next EU treaty and use its veto power to achieve 'EEA lite'.
"There is an increasingly promising prospect that Britain will be able to secure a better deal with the EU on the back of a new EU Treaty primarily intended to resolve the euro-crisis", Conway argues. Only then, with this trade framework in place, should Britain formally announce its exit from the EU.
"It is... within the context of EU negotiations for a new Treaty that Britain's best prospects lie for being able to regain the economic and political freedoms it has lost to Brussels without having to forgo continued full access to the Single Market."
The text of the book, With Friends Like These... Why Britain should leave the EU - and how, can be downloaded here.
David Conway taught philosophy for over thirty years at Middlesex University where he was head of the School of Philosophy and Religious Studies. He subsequently joined Civitas as a Senior Research Fellow and continues the association as a Visiting Professorial Research Fellow. His publications include A Farewell to Marx, Classical Liberalism, The Rediscovery of Wisdom, In Defence of the Realm, A Nation of Immigrants?, Disunited Kingdom, and Liberal Education and the National Curriculum. He voted against British membership of the EEC in the 1975 Referendum, having been persuaded by the argument that the attendant loss of sovereignty would be too high a price to pay, whatever economic benefits it promised.
For further information contact:
T: 0207 799 6677
Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society is an independent, cross-party think tank that facilitates informed public debate on important issues of the day. It is not affiliated to any political party and receives no state funding
Latest News from
IFS - End of furlough likely to be particularly tough for older workers17/06/2021 11:35:00
While a lot of the focus on the employment effects of the pandemic has, rightly, been on the young, employees over the age of 65 were 40% more likely to be furloughed in late April than those in their 40s (14% versus 10%).
“The Bank of England should end its asset purchases now”: IEA expert comments on ONS inflation figures17/06/2021 10:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to consumer price inflation figures published by the Office for National Statistics, which show inflation has jumped to 2.1 per cent
IFG - Covid-hit public services could be further disrupted by government targets17/06/2021 09:35:00
Government targets in public services may do more harm than good, warns a new paper from the Institute for Government.
Delay to roadmap could lead to “a further rash of business closures”: IEA expert comments on ONS labour market figures15/06/2021 13:30:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the labour market figures from the Office of National Statistics showing the unemployment rate has fallen to 4.7 per cent
“Chancellor right to reject calls for furlough extension”, says IEA expert15/06/2021 12:30:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on calls to extend the furlough scheme
Civitas - Study finds over 80% CofE dioceses appoint clergy who advocate racial justice activist claims & over 70% promoting climate activism – marking Church’s ‘separation of the head from the body’10/06/2021 11:35:00
In a new report, researchers have set out to investigate the scale of support for ultra-progressive radical activist agendas alleging ‘systemic racism’ in English society, the understanding and use of ‘unconscious biases’ and prescribing a ‘climate emergency’ doctrine within the Church of England.
‘Special relationship’ can thrive if UK forges new green trade agenda with US at G7 summit – IPPR report10/06/2021 10:35:00
Ahead of the G7 leaders’ summit in Cornwall, the IPPR think tank is urging the UK to spearhead efforts to rewrite the rules of global trade.
IEA - “Social distancing rules must go on 21st June”: IEA expert responds to ONS data on UK pubs and bars sector10/06/2021 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to figures from the Office for National Statistics showing that 55 per cent of pub staff are still furloughed and only 24 per cent of pub owners have “high confidence” that their business will survive the next three months
‘Bitter irony’ that health and care staff are made ill by their work: The King’s Fund response to the Commons Committee report on workforce burnout and resilience08/06/2021 11:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, responded to the Health and Social Care Committee report on workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care