Collective action can spark innovation for data flows
The UK, Japan, and EU can lead the way in using the G7 ‘data free flow with trust’ roadmap to ensure data transfers with robust security and privacy standards.
‘Data free flow with trust’ (DFFT) – which seeks to enable cross-border free flow of data while addressing concerns over privacy, data protection, intellectual property rights, and security – has been a priority of global digital policy coordination since the G20 first raised it during Japan’s 2019 presidency.
Although positively received by a wide range of countries which recognize the potential economic and social benefits of enabling a greater cross-border flow of data, it is not easy to introduce common legal frameworks to ensure DFFT. Countries often have varied domestic and regional legal frameworks due to different concepts of privacy or data security.
The G7 did put digital policy at the centre of its 2021 agenda, discussing broad digital and technology shifts from physical infrastructure such as 5G, future communication technologies, and technical standards to soft infrastructure, such as rule-making on data flow and internet safety principles. And one notable outcome was the establishment of the G7 Roadmap for Cooperation on Data Free Flow with Trust at the G7 Digital and Technology Ministers’ meeting in April 2021 – also endorsed by two of the G7’s guest countries South Korea and Australia.
But despite shared democratic values of open and competitive markets, strong safeguards for human rights, and fundamental freedoms, the G7 and its partners have different ideas on how best to approach DFFT, and so greater UK-EU-Japan policy coordination to overcome any inconsistencies in approach can play a key role.
Click here to continue reading the full version of this Expert Comment on the Chatham House website.
Latest News from
Russia and 9/11: Roads not taken10/09/2021 12:20:00
Many Russia watchers recall the fleeting moment 20 years ago when the country could have moved away from a path of confrontation with the US.
The dangerous impact of 9/11 on arms control measures09/09/2021 15:38:00
Momentous decisions made during the post-2001 era have failed to control weapons of all types, but now is the time to put right those wrongs.
Learnings must become practice as the Taliban return09/09/2021 12:20:00
There is greater awareness of the adverse impact of counterterrorism measures and sanctions on humanitarian action.
Facing reality is painful for the US and its allies06/09/2021 16:20:00
Experts from across Chatham House analyse the strategic and intelligence failures in Afghanistan, and the lasting effects on the US, UK, NATO and the EU.
With Afghanistan, control is much harder than victory06/09/2021 09:20:00
The Taliban taking charge of Afghanistan is likely to significantly destabilize the wider region, as the various militant threats will be hard to manage.
Iraqis protest is symptom of embedded corruption03/09/2021 16:20:00
Hospital fires and electricity cuts have prompted angry protests, and many Iraqis see government corruption and mismanagement as the root of their suffering.
Middle East prepares for the US to exit Syria03/09/2021 09:20:00
The Arab world has taken note of the withdrawal from Afghanistan and is starting to wonder whether Syria, with several hundred US troops, will be next.
New roles for military in health emergency preparedness31/08/2021 15:10:00
New guidance from the WHO outlines how the military and health sectors can work together to be ready for future infectious disease outbreaks.