Electoral Commission statement on performance of Tower Hamlets Returning Officer at 2014 European and local elections
Under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (2000) the Electoral Commission has a statutory power to determine and publish standards of performance for Returning Officers.
Following the European Parliamentary, local and mayoral elections in May 2014, the Commission said that it would delay making its final assessment of the Tower Hamlets Returning Officer’s performance against these standards until after the publication of the Tower Hamlets election petition judgement, which related to the election of the Tower Hamlets Mayor. Following publication of this judgement earlier this year, the Electoral Commission has now concluded its assessment of the Returning Officer’s performance.
The Electoral Commission has found that in respect of the verification and count at the European Parliamentary and local elections, the Returning Officer did not meet elements of performance standards 1 and 2.
Performance standard 1 relates to voters and the need for them to have confidence that their vote will be counted in the way they intended. Performance standard 2 relates to those who want to stand for election and the need for candidates to have confidence that the count process is well-managed, and have confidence in the results.
The Commission found that the Returning Officer had inadequate resources for the verification of ballot papers and counting of ballot papers. This meant that the delivery of the verification and count was severely delayed, but did achieve an accurate result in a transparent manner.
The Returning Officer at the London Borough of Tower Hamlets met the Commission’s performance standards in relation to his duties at the 2014 mayoral election.
After each election, where fees are payable by Government, the Commission may recommend to the Secretary of State that there should a reduction in the fee paid to a Returning Officer if the Commission believes their performance has been inadequate. Alternatively, a Returning Officer may themselves propose a reduction in the fee they may take.
The Tower Hamlets Returning Officer agreed with the Commission’s assessment of his performance and to a reduction in his fee for carrying out his duties as Returning Officer for the European Parliamentary election. As a result the Returning Officer will be receiving a reduction of 12.5% (£1,105.38) of their total fee of £8,843.
The Electoral Commission will continue to support the Returning Officer in Tower Hamlets in all aspects of his work including in relation to electoral integrity issues.
For further information contact:
Karim Aziz in the Electoral Commission press office on 020 7271 0704 firstname.lastname@example.org
Out of office hours 07789 920 414
Notes to editors
- The Electoral Commission is an independent body set up by the UK Parliament. Our aim is integrity and public confidence in the UK’s democratic process. We regulate party and election finance and set standards for well-run elections and are responsible for the conduct and regulation of referendum held under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (2000).
- Returning Officers are legally entitled to recover their charges in respect of services rendered, or expenses incurred, for, or in connection with, an election. This is comprised of two elements: a maximum amount recoverable in respect of specified services rendered and a maximum amount recoverable in respect of specified expenses incurred in connection with the election. This first element is commonly referred to as the RO’s ‘personal fee’. At the 2014 European Parliamentary elections, under the European Parliamentary (Amendment) Regulations 2013 the Commission may make a recommendation to the Secretary of State that a local returning officer or returning officer’s personal fee should be reduced or withheld (and therefore be less than the maximum amount recoverable set out in the relevant Fees and Charges Order) where the Commission thinks that the (L) ROs performance has been inadequate.
- The Electoral Commission considered whether a reduction in fees was appropriate based upon performance against four key areas of responsibility: the planning, general management and oversight of the election; the provision and organisation of polling stations; postal voting; and the verification and count. In relation to the delivery of these four areas for the European Parliamentary election in May 2014, the Commission considered it would be appropriate to reduce the fee in relation to the delivery of the element relating to the count process only.
Latest News from
Electoral Commission statement on the outcome of Vote Leave's judicial review13/11/2019 15:20:00
An Electoral Commission spokesperson yesterday gave a statement on the outcome of Vote Leave's judicial review.
Party and non-party campaigner spending of £250,000 in Great Britain or under at the European Parliamentary elections published08/11/2019 09:25:00
The Electoral Commission yesterday published the campaign spending returns of political parties and registered non-party campaigners that spent £250,000 or less during the 2019 European Parliamentary elections.
Statement: UK Parliamentary General Election31/10/2019 17:11:00
Bob Posner, Chief Executive at the Electoral Commission yesterday gave a Statement on the UK Parliamentary General Election.
Statement – ruling that EC can keep and publish copies of Grassroots Out Ltd’s spending return22/10/2019 09:25:00
An Electoral Commission spokesperson yesterday commented on the ruling that the Commission can retain and publish the referendum spending return for Grassroots Out Ltd.
Monthly update – oncluded investigations15/10/2019 11:05:00
Details of the investigations concluded in the last month have been published today by the Electoral Commission. This is an important part of delivering transparency in political finance in the UK.
Petitions to recall MPs should mirror the secrecy of the ballot, finds new report10/10/2019 12:51:00
The Electoral Commission has today made recommendations to improve the process for recalling sitting MPs, including the need to protect secrecy for individuals who choose to sign the petition.
Voter difficulties caused by delays implementing electoral changes, finds new report on May elections10/10/2019 10:25:00
A report into the May 2019 elections, published recently (08 October 2019) by the Electoral Commission, has highlighted that government delays in taking forward established recommendations for electoral reform led to difficulties experienced by those who wanted to vote.
Major study shows changes are needed to help millions of people ensure they can vote26/09/2019 12:48:00
Electoral registration processes need updating in order to ensure as many people as possible are registered, according to a new study by the Electoral Commission.