Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC - formerly IPCC)
Final written warning for Surrey Police officer following gross misconduct hearing
A Surrey Police Officer who failed to maintain an appropriate professional boundary with a vulnerable woman has been given a final written warning following an investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).
An independently chaired disciplinary panel found misconduct proven against Police Constable Jason Cooling at a hearing organised by the force on Monday 19 July. He was found to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour for authority, respect and courtesy, duties and responsibilities and discreditable conduct.
We started our independent investigation in June 2020 after receiving a mandatory conduct referral from the force. Evidence we gathered indicated that in May 2020, PC Cooling and another officer were deployed to an incident where a woman was experiencing mental health issues. Officers detained the woman and she was taken to a local hospital, where she was initially monitored by PC Cooling and his colleague. Her supervision was handed over to two other officers and the woman told them that she and PC Cooling had gone out for a long chat in the night and that she had learned information about his private life.
The officers returned to the police station and raised their concerns around this. Checks revealed that the woman and PC Cooling were following one another on Instagram.
Our investigation ended in September 2020 and while there was no indication that PC Cooling and the woman formed a physical relationship, we found that PC Cooling may have acted inappropriately by disclosing personal information about himself and contacting the woman on Instagram. College of Policing guidelines clearly state that officers must not engage in, or pursue, a sexual or improper emotional relationship, on or off duty, with any member of the public that they come into contact with during the course of their current work or duties.
A gross misconduct hearing was held and the disciplinary panel found PC Cooling’s communications with the woman at the hospital were appropriate, but the messages exchanged with her over social media were inappropriate and not in the course of his policing duties. The panel also found PC Cooling later deleted these messages in an attempt to conceal his wrongdoing and failed to notify Surrey Police of the private communications he had with the woman.
IOPC Regional Director, Graham Beesley, yesterday said:
“Police officers abusing their position to form inappropriate relationships for sexual purposes erodes the trust and confidence the public has in policing.
“There are policies and guidance in place to ensure police officers maintain professional boundaries whenever they interact with members of the public.
“PC Cooling crossed those boundaries and then tried to conceal his behaviour. Receiving a final written warning reflects the seriousness of this matter and serves as a reminder to other police officers of their obligation to know the line around abusing their position in this way and that it is never acceptable.”
During our investigation, we obtained witness accounts from police officers. We also considered College of Policing guidance on maintaining a professional boundary between police and members of the public, and Surrey Police policies on abuse of position of trust for a sexual purpose or improper emotional relationship.
Latest News from
Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC - formerly IPCC)
IOPC investigation following Bromley incident23/09/2021 09:25:00
The Independent Office for Police Conduct’s Regional Director for London, Sal Naseem, said: “We have now started an independent investigation into the contact Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) officers had with a 70-year-old man who was taken to hospital with serious injuries following an incident in Bromley, south-east London around 12 noon on 13 September.
Officers acted appropriately prior to fatal Waltham Abbey collision21/09/2021 13:25:00
Officers acted appropriately, following policies and procedures during a pursuit prior to a fatal road traffic collision in Essex, an Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation concluded.
IOPC upholds driver’s racial profiling complaint against the Met21/09/2021 12:25:00
Three Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) officers are to face a gross misconduct hearing after an Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation upheld a driver’s complaint that he was racially profiled during a stop and search in Lewisham, south east London.
Independent Office for Police Conduct publishes Impact Report 2020/2117/09/2021 11:15:00
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has today, Friday 17 September 2021, published its Impact Report 2020/21, outlining the work it has done over the last year to help improve policing.
Investigation into West Yorkshire Police actions prior to quadruple fatal collision found officers acted appropriately15/09/2021 13:05:00
An Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation into the actions of West Yorkshire Police prior to a collision in Bradford in which four men died found that officers acted in accordance with policy and procedures.
Former Gwent Police officer charged with misconduct in public office15/09/2021 09:05:00
A former Gwent Police officer has been charged with two counts of misconduct in public office, following an investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).
Bedfordshire police officer on trial over driving offence14/09/2021 13:20:00
A Bedfordshire Police officer faces a trial, accused of driving without due care and attention.
West Midlands Police officer charged with ABH07/09/2021 12:25:00
A serving West Midlands Police officer was yesterday charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm following an investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).
Misconduct panel rules former Met constables would have been dismissed over texts03/09/2021 09:10:00
Two former Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) who sent misogynistic and discriminatory text messages would have been dismissed from the force without notice had they still been serving, a disciplinary panel concluded.