Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Government must better guide and support Whitehall to reset failing projects
The resetting of failing major programmes by Whitehall is made more difficult by a lack of guidance and structure from Government. In a wide-ranging report published recently (15 September 2023) on the issue of resetting Government programmes, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) finds that there is no specific guidance for departments on how to reset complex multi-billion pound schemes. The Government must get better at learning from and recognising the value of resets, which vary from fundamental changes to significant revisions of cost and time estimates.
- PAC report finds new risks created by resetting programmes not always effectively managed
- Lack of transparent and honest culture in projects creates obstacles to necessary resets of major schemes
- Read the full report (HTML)
- Read the full report (PDF)
- Read the report summary
- Find all publications related to this inquiry, including oral and written evidence
When successfully carried out, resets help projects get back on track – but the new risks that resets can create are not always effectively managed. The lack of a definition for what constitutes a reset also causes confusion, and can hinder lesson-learning. For example, the number of resets to date of the Ajax armoured vehicle programme remains unclear, but is at least two and probably three. The Ministry of Defence’s failure to recognise the new risks and opportunities created by resetting (such as changes to commercial relationships) then necessitated a further reset.
In some projects, the lack of a transparent and honest culture results in resets happening later than needed. For example, the PAC found evidence of a culture where there was insufficient candour in the Crossrail programme, meaning it started to believe its own ‘on-time, on-budget’ mantra, and stopping many people raising issues. Not having the right environment to encourage diverse views has also created problems identifying and managing resets, with more progress to be made in improving diversity in both central Government and the programme profession.
Government departments do not always have the specific skills needed to undertake a reset, including not always having the right leadership. The PAC has previously commented on programmes’ leadership moving on too quickly. The report finds that while the situation is improving, there are challenges in encouraging senior leaders to stay in their roles, given a lack of civil service pay incentives. The PAC calls on Cabinet Office and HM Treasury to work with departments to ensure they use any available levers where it is best to incentivise continuity of leadership.
Public Accounts Committee Chair, Dame Meg Hillier MP, said:
“It can be hard to admit for any high-stakes endeavour when it is time to change direction. This is especially so for officials in the glare of publicity at the helm of innovative and risky projects with budgets of many billions, under pressure for delivery both from politicians and the public’s understandable expectations for improvements. If the Government does not provide senior leaders in Whitehall with the necessary support, clear-eyed and hard decisions will not be made when required.
No one wants to see such high-cost projects designed to benefit the public fail, so a robust culture of openness and honesty with diverse points of view must be present to successfully course-correct a progamme which looks at risk. Our report finds a range of ways resets can go wrong – they can be rushed, avoided until too late, even create new problems. There are invaluable lessons to be found for the future in how to strike the right balance.”
- Inquiry: Resetting government programmes
- Public Accounts Committee
- About Parliament: Select committees
- Visiting Parliament: Watch committees
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Parliament must vote on Pacific trade deal before the UK joins, Committee says20/02/2024 11:25:00
MPs on the Business and Trade Committee have called for the Government to allow lawmakers a debate and a vote on joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) trade bloc.
Homecare medicines services: an opportunity lost—Lords committee ask Government for clarification19/02/2024 11:25:00
In November 2023, the Public Services Committee published its report into the Homecare medicines services provision and raised its concerns about the sector.
Procedure and Privileges Committee publishes Second Report13/02/2024 12:05:00
The Committee has proposed a new Standing Order which, if agreed by the House, would temporarily exclude from the parliamentary estate any member who had been formally charged with a serious violent or sexual offence.
Urgent reform needed to improve independence, accountability and performance of UK regulators08/02/2024 16:05:00
The Industry and Regulators Committee has raised significant concerns over the role of UK regulators, their ability to operate with genuine independence from Government, and how they are held to account.
Chair Comment: Reform of dental contract ‘missing piece’ from government recovery plan08/02/2024 13:05:00
Health and Social Care Committee Chair Steve Brine MP yesterday responded to the publication of the government’s Plan to Recover and Reform NHS Dentistry.
Bank of England has taken a leap in the dark on quantitative tightening, Treasury Committee concludes07/02/2024 14:05:00
The Treasury Committee concludes the Bank of England’s programme of active quantitative tightening is a leap in the dark as the Bank has not been able to fully consider the broader economic consequences.
AI regulatory gap analysis a welcome first step towards addressing AI governance challenges, says Committee Chair07/02/2024 13:05:00
Following the publication of a command paper setting out the Government’s plans for artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, the Chair of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, Rt Hon Greg Clark MP, has welcomed further details of its intended approach.
The UK’s electric vehicle strategy needs a rapid recharge says Lords Committee06/02/2024 15:25:00
The Environment and Climate Change Committee has published its report 'EV strategy: rapid recharge needed'.
Financial Reporting and Audit in Local Authorities - Levelling-Up Committee publishes Government response06/02/2024 13:05:00
The Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (LUHC) Committee yesterday published the Government’s response to the Committee’s report on Financial Reporting and Audit in Local Authorities.