Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Government warned to proceed with caution on AI in autonomous weapons
The Artificial Intelligence in Weapon Systems Committee publishes its report Proceed with Caution: Artificial Intelligence in Weapon Systems.
- Report: Proceed with caution: Artificial Intelligence in weapon systems (HTML)
- Report: Proceed with caution: Artificial Intelligence in weapon systems (PDF)
- Shorthand story: Proceed with caution: Artificial Intelligence in weapon systems
- Inquiry: AI in weapon systems
- AI in Weapon Systems Committee
While the Government aims to be “ambitious, safe, responsible”, in its application of artificial intelligence (AI) in defence, aspiration has not lived up to reality.
Bringing AI into the realm of warfare through the use of AI-enabled autonomous weapons systems (AWS) could revolutionise defence technology, but the Government must approach the development and use of AI in AWS in a way that is ethical and legal, while providing key strategic and battlefield benefits. "Ambitious, safe and responsible" must be translated into practical implementation.
As part of this, the Government must seek, establish and retain public confidence and democratic endorsement in the development and use of AI generally, and especially in respect of AWS. This will include increasing public understanding of AI and autonomous weapons, enhancing the role of Parliament in decision making on autonomous weapons, and retaining public confidence in the development and use of autonomous weapons.
The Committee’s key recommendations include:
- The Government should lead by example in international engagement on regulation of AWS. Outcomes from international debate on the regulation of AWS could be a legally binding treaty or non-binding measures clarifying the application of international humanitarian law. A key element of international engagement will also include leading on efforts to prohibit the use of AI in nuclear command, control and communications.
- The Government should adopt an operational definition of AWS. The Committee was surprised the Government does not currently have one and believes it is possible to create a future-proofed definition which would aid the UK’s ability to make meaningful policy on AWS and engage fully in international discussions.
- The Government should ensure human control at all stages of an AWS’s lifecycle. It is essential to have human control over the deployment of the system both to ensure human moral agency and legal compliance. This must be buttressed by our absolute national commitment to the requirements of international humanitarian law.
- The Government should ensure that its procurement processes are appropriately designed for the world of AI. The Committee heard that the Ministry of Defence’s procurement suffers from a lack of accountability and is overly bureaucratic. It further heard that the Ministry of Defence lacks capability in relation to software and data, both of which are central to the development of AI. This may require revolutionary change. The Committee warns, “if so, so be it; but time is short.”
“Artificial Intelligence has spread into many areas of life and defence is no exception. How it could revolutionise defence technology is one of the most controversial uses of AI today.
“There is a growing sense that AI will have a major influence on the future of warfare, and there has been particular debate about how autonomous weapons can comply with international humanitarian law.
“In our report Proceed with Caution: Artificial Intelligence in Weapon Systems, we welcome the fact that the Government has recognised the role of responsible AI in its future defence capability. AI has the potential to provide key battlefield and strategic benefits. However, we make proposals that in doing so, the Government must approach the development and use of AI in AWS cautiously.
“It must embed ethical and legal principles at all stages of design, development and deployment, while achieving public understanding and democratic endorsement.
“Technology should be used when advantageous, but not at unacceptable cost to the UK's moral principles.”
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Government encouraged to engage fully with EAC recommendations for boosting financial sector’s role in achieving net zero23/02/2024 16:10:00
The Government has confirmed that it will not introduce quarterly reporting on how it is meeting net zero targets while enhancing energy security when it rolls out new oil and gas licences in the North Sea.
Parliament must vote on Pacific trade deal before the UK joins, Committee says20/02/2024 11:25:00
MPs on the Business and Trade Committee have called for the Government to allow lawmakers a debate and a vote on joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) trade bloc.
Homecare medicines services: an opportunity lost—Lords committee ask Government for clarification19/02/2024 11:25:00
In November 2023, the Public Services Committee published its report into the Homecare medicines services provision and raised its concerns about the sector.
Procedure and Privileges Committee publishes Second Report13/02/2024 12:05:00
The Committee has proposed a new Standing Order which, if agreed by the House, would temporarily exclude from the parliamentary estate any member who had been formally charged with a serious violent or sexual offence.
Urgent reform needed to improve independence, accountability and performance of UK regulators08/02/2024 16:05:00
The Industry and Regulators Committee has raised significant concerns over the role of UK regulators, their ability to operate with genuine independence from Government, and how they are held to account.
Chair Comment: Reform of dental contract ‘missing piece’ from government recovery plan08/02/2024 13:05:00
Health and Social Care Committee Chair Steve Brine MP yesterday responded to the publication of the government’s Plan to Recover and Reform NHS Dentistry.
Bank of England has taken a leap in the dark on quantitative tightening, Treasury Committee concludes07/02/2024 14:05:00
The Treasury Committee concludes the Bank of England’s programme of active quantitative tightening is a leap in the dark as the Bank has not been able to fully consider the broader economic consequences.
AI regulatory gap analysis a welcome first step towards addressing AI governance challenges, says Committee Chair07/02/2024 13:05:00
Following the publication of a command paper setting out the Government’s plans for artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, the Chair of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, Rt Hon Greg Clark MP, has welcomed further details of its intended approach.