Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
High-Speed 2 project managers “blindsided by contact with reality”
In a report published yesterday, Sunday 17th May 2020, the Public Accounts Committee says the High Speed 2 rail project has gone “badly off course”, and demands that Government gives regular, accurate and open updates on the problems the project is facing and progress on developing the appropriate skills and capabilities.
- Read the summary
- Read the conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: High Speed 2: Spring 2020 Update (PDF)
- Inquiry: High Speed 2: Spring 2020 Update
- Public Accounts Committee
The Committee finds that the Department for Transport (DfT) Permanent Secretary and HS2 Ltd executives’ appearance before the Committee in March 2020 raised questions about the previous picture, provided by the witnesses, of the project’s health.
Failure to deliver Phase One
The Department and HS2 Ltd were aware of the scale of the project’s cost and schedule overruns as early as October 2018. In March 2019, HS2 Ltd formally advised the Department that it would not be able to deliver Phase One of the programme on time or within the available funding. However, the Permanent Secretary did not make this clear when she appeared before the previous Committee in October 2018 and May 2019, even when asked specific questions about the programme’s delivery timeline and budget.
The Department’s emerging estimate in December 2019 gave a potential cost of between £65 billion and £88 billion: 17% and 58% respectively more than the available funding of £55.7 billion. These estimates were all given in 2015 prices, and so will also be revised to reflect inflation and changes in prices into the future.
HS2 Ltd’s annual report and accounts for the year ending 31 March 2019 similarly failed to give an accurate account of the programme’s problems. In evidence to the Committee, the Department and HS2 pleaded commercial sensitivity and ongoing efforts to address the problems, but the Committee says this was not an adequate excuse for not disclosing the risk and uncertainty the programme was facing.
A lack of capability
The Committee has previously raised concerns about the Department’s capacity to deliver High Speed Two, as well as its wider programme portfolio, and is not convinced that the Department and HS2 Ltd have the skills and capability they need, now or in the future. A lack of capability continues to be an issue: by its own recent assessment HS2 Ltd still has gaps in key areas such as risk management and assurance, project management and project control.
For example, as the legislation for Phase One project passed through Parliament the forecast costs of undertakings and assurances to the communities affected along the route have more than quadrupled: from an allowance of £245 million in HS2 Ltd’s early estimate, to a current indicative estimate of £1.2 billion.
In oral evidence the Committee questioned the basis for the £46,000 bonus paid in 2019 to Mark Thurston, HS2 Ltd’s chief executive, on top of his £605,350 salary – the highest of any Government official. The bonus was linked to a set of measures including control of the project’s finances, though its estimated cost has almost doubled to more than £100 billion, in current prices.
DfT must demonstrate with regular, open accounts
The Committee is not convinced that the Department is learning from problems across its major infrastructure projects to make sufficient and meaningful changes to its management of infrastructure programmes. In its recommendations to Government, the Committee is seeking new, formal assurances that DfT and HS2 Ltd have the capability to manage the programme and its supply chain, into construction and through to completion.
Commenting on the report, Committee Chair Meg Hillier MP yesterday said:
“The Committee is concerned about how open the Department and HS2 Ltd executives have been in their account of this project. It is massively over budget and delayed before work has even begun. There is no excuse for hiding the nature and extent of the problems the project was facing from Parliament and the taxpayer. The Department and HS2 appear to have been blindsided by contact with reality – when Phase One started moving through Parliament, the predicted costs of necessary commitments to the communities affected have exploded from £245 million to £1.2 billion.
“The Government unfortunately has a wealth of mistakes on major transport infrastructure to learn from, but it does not give confidence that it is finally going to take those lessons when this is its approach. In the six-monthly reports the Department has now agreed to give us, we want to see an honest, open account, and evidence of learning from past mistakes being applied to bring this project under control, to deliver it within the timeline and budget that have been agreed in justifying the project.”
The Committee’s Deputy Chair Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP yesterday said:
“This PAC report on HS2 is one of the most critical, in both the transparency of Government and the handling of a project, that I
have seen in my nine years in total on the committee.
“The Permanent Secretary appeared before the committee in October 2018 and again in May 2019. In March 2019 HS2 Ltd formally told the Department it had breached the terms of the Development Agreement, and would be unable to deliver the programme to cost and schedule – yet the Permanent Secretary did not inform the committee on either appearance that the programme was in trouble.
“This is a serious breach of the department’s duty to Parliament and hence to the public, which as the report says, will undermine confidence. Furthermore, the PAC was in the dark about serious cost overruns and was therefore unable to do its duty to inform Parliament that value for money on the project was at risk.
“The cost overruns have been blamed partly on the speed that the hybrid Bill committee for Phase One proceeded with. I was a member of that committee, which lasted for 20 months: this is complete nonsense.”
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Committee welcomes news that fans will be allowed to attend football matches after lockdown25/11/2020 15:33:00
Petitions Committee Chair Catherine McKinnell MP, and Committee member Jonathan Gullis MP, have welcomed the news that some fans will be allowed to attend matches when national Covid-19 restrictions end on 2 December.
MPs press Government to provide support for FareShare scheme25/11/2020 13:43:00
The House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee has urged the Government to provide £5 million in extra funding to support those struggling to afford sufficient food this winter.
Tax policy should be made at fiscal events, urges Treasury Committee25/11/2020 11:38:00
The Government has made a string of tax policy announcements throughout the year, rather than at fiscal events, such as a new consultation on making tax digital for corporation tax, excise duties, and on tackling promoters of tax avoidance.
Chair writes to Health and Safety Executive over importance of independence24/11/2020 15:33:00
Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee Stephen Timms MP has written to the Chair of the Health and Safety Executive Sarah Newton about reports that the HSE was under ‘political’ pressure to approve Personal Protective Equipment from a particular contractor for use during the coronavirus pandemic.
Chair responds to announcement on outdoor grassroots sports24/11/2020 14:25:00
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Chair Julian Knight yesterday responded to the Prime Minister's Covid-19 update in the Commons.
Committee urges Chancellor to help those who have fallen through the gaps of coronavirus support24/11/2020 13:33:00
The Treasury Committee’s Gaps in Support report in June urged the Government to act to help those who have lost livelihoods while being locked down and locked out of support.
Committee to call in social media companies on COVID-19 vaccine misinformation24/11/2020 11:38:00
The use of online misinformation about the development of vaccines to tackle COVID-19 will be considered by the DCMS Sub-committee on Online Harms and Disinformation in a session to take place next month.
Chair urges clarity on Covid-19 rules to help protect jobs24/11/2020 09:33:00
Following an evidence hearing with businesses, unions and representative business groups from sectors including retail, leisure and hospitality earlier this week, Darren Jones, Chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee has written to Alok Sharma, Secretary of State, to call for the Government to provide urgent clarity over Covid-19 restrictions and the rules so businesses can prepare for when England’s lockdown is expected to end on December 2nd.
Treasury must answer questions on procurement process23/11/2020 16:25:00
Rt Hon. Mel Stride MP, Chair of the Treasury Committee, has written to the Chancellor about the National Audit Office’s (NAO) report, Investigation into Government Procurement during the Covid-19 pandemic.