How the international system should tackle climate risk
For the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to succeed, there must be an urgent move away from reactive ‘defence-oriented’ mindsets when managing climate risk.
Roughly two dozen international organizations, mostly in the United Nations (UN) family, foster cooperation and set the global agenda on a range of critical issues, including health, water, energy, environment, food, migration, security, and development.
Collectively they provide the world with a critical safety net and, in the words of the second UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld, the purpose is not to lead humanity to heaven but rather to ‘save it from hell’.
Climate change certainly provides a potentially hellish problem – happening everywhere, at all scales, and cascading across borders and sectors with unpredictable impacts. It is already damaging critical infrastructure, undermining economic growth, and displacing entire communities, and is an existential challenge for low-lying island states and coastal areas.
But our international ‘safety net’ was largely built between the end of the Second World War and the 1970s, before the impacts of anthropogenic climate change were widely understood, leaving the question of whether this system is fit for purpose in a climate-changing world.
Click here to continue reading the full version of this Expert Comment on the Chatham House website.
Latest News from
The UK must cooperate with France in the Indo-Pacific27/09/2021 10:38:00
Despite understandable French anger over AUKUS, the UK and France share similar interests and partners in the Indo-Pacific and must navigate current tensions.
Biden’s realism will drive competition among US allies24/09/2021 13:10:00
The US president appears determined to remove sentiment from foreign policy, instead combining minilateralism and multilateralism to achieve his objectives.
Russia and 9/11: Roads not taken10/09/2021 12:20:00
Many Russia watchers recall the fleeting moment 20 years ago when the country could have moved away from a path of confrontation with the US.
The dangerous impact of 9/11 on arms control measures09/09/2021 15:38:00
Momentous decisions made during the post-2001 era have failed to control weapons of all types, but now is the time to put right those wrongs.
Learnings must become practice as the Taliban return09/09/2021 12:20:00
There is greater awareness of the adverse impact of counterterrorism measures and sanctions on humanitarian action.
Facing reality is painful for the US and its allies06/09/2021 16:20:00
Experts from across Chatham House analyse the strategic and intelligence failures in Afghanistan, and the lasting effects on the US, UK, NATO and the EU.
With Afghanistan, control is much harder than victory06/09/2021 09:20:00
The Taliban taking charge of Afghanistan is likely to significantly destabilize the wider region, as the various militant threats will be hard to manage.
Iraqis protest is symptom of embedded corruption03/09/2021 16:20:00
Hospital fires and electricity cuts have prompted angry protests, and many Iraqis see government corruption and mismanagement as the root of their suffering.