IFG - Government must use Brexit extension to prepare for next phase of talks
The UK risks stumbling into the next phase of negotiations with the EU without a plan, putting the country at an unnecessary disadvantage, according to a new report by the Institute for Government.
Published today, Negotiating Brexit: Preparing for talks on the UK’s future relationship with the EUlooks at what went right – and wrong – in the first phase of EU negotiations. It makes a series of recommendations about how the Government should approach the much tougher issues surrounding the UK’s long-term future relationship with the EU. The extension of Article 50 provides an opportunity for the UK to prepare properly for the next phase of talks, which will inevitably happen whether or not the UK leaves with a withdrawal agreement.
The report says that the main problems in the first phase were at the political level. The negotiations were bedevilled by the absence of Cabinet agreement on the shape of the future economic relationship. Politicians, particularly on the Government backbenches, did not trust the UK’s official negotiators.
Split responsibilities between No.10 and DExEU, stemming from the original misguided decision to create a dedicated Brexit department, caused tensions and ultimately proved unsustainable. The Government engaged Parliament late, alienated the devolved governments and failed to make use of external expertise.
In terms of tactics, the UK’s divide and rule’ diplomatic strategy cut little ice with the leaders of other member states, who rallied behind the European Commission negotiators.
But not everything went wrong. When negotiations succeeded (with Euratom for example), it was because the UK decided on its objectives early and engaged with specifics.
The report argues that the next round will be shaped by the Government’s decision on what type of relationship with the EU the UK is seeking. Before negotiations begin, the authors say, the Government should agree, and publish, its ambition for the future relationship, without drawing absolute red lines.
The report recommends that:
- The Prime Minister should appoint a ministerial deputy, based in the Cabinet Office, to oversee the day-to-day negotiations (taking that role away from DExEU). They should be supported by a secretariat drawn from the departments with the greatest involvement in the talks.
- The Government finds a way to use the expertise in the Department for International Trade (DIT) whose staff currently have little role in the EU negotiations.
- The Government should engage Parliament and the devolved administrations early and consistently.
- The Government sets up structures and processes to allow detailed outside input into its plans.
- The Government rethinks its approach to engaging member states to get the tone right.
Tim Durrant, lead author, said:
“Negotiations on our future relationship with the EU will be much more complex than the divorce. They will also set the context for the UK’s relationship with other countries for decades to come. It is vital that the Government uses the next months to develop a better understanding of how the EU will approach the next phase. The time available for negotiations is short and the Government must not waste time by failing to prepare.”
Jill Rutter added:
“The Prime Minister moved quickly to establish the Department for Exiting the EU and the Department for International Trade within a day of taking office. Those hasty decisions created completely foreseeable problems for the exit negotiations, compounded by the inability of the Cabinet to reach an agreed position on the key future economic relationship. Whoever is Prime Minister for the second phase of the negotiations needs to ensure that they avoid similar mistakes next time round.”
Notes to editors
Latest News from
IFG - Whitehall Monitor 2020: Government hurt by high rates of staff turnover21/01/2020 10:35:00
A new report from the Institute for Government has found that continued turnover of ministers and civil servants could disrupt the delivery of government projects and policies.
IEA: Oxfam’s obsession with the rich distracts from tackling poverty21/01/2020 09:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs commented on Oxfam’s latest report ‘Time to Care’
NIESR: Monthly CPI Tracker – Drop in CPI Inflation Expected to be Temporary16/01/2020 14:25:00
The consumer price index inflation rate declined to 1.3 per cent in the year to December 2019, as per data released by the ONS.
IFG - The government needs to counter its loss of clout in Europe after Brexit16/01/2020 11:35:00
The UK needs to raise its game if it wants to remain influential in Europe, says a new report by the Institute for Government.
Adam Smith Inst - Flybe should not get special treatment, no one company should16/01/2020 10:35:00
Matthew Lesh, Head of Research at the Adam Smith Institute, warns that the government should not be picking winners in industry when it comes to bailouts or tax cuts.
IPPR - Revealed: GP gender pay gap as high as 35 per cent16/01/2020 09:35:00
IPPR analysis finds female GPs are earning on average £40,000 a year less than their male colleagues due to broken ‘two-tier system’
NIESR: Monthly GDP Tracker – UK Output Stagnated at end of 201914/01/2020 14:25:00
The UK economy is on course to post zero growth in the fourth quarter of 2019, consistent with growth of 1.4 per cent in 2019 as a whole. On the basis of recent trends we tentatively forecast service sector-driven growth of 0.3 per cent in the first quarter of 2020.
JRF responds to Local Housing Allowance increase14/01/2020 11:35:00
Helen Barnard, Deputy Director of Policy and Partnerships, responded to the Local Housing Allowance increase