IPPR - Revealed: GP gender pay gap as high as 35 per cent
IPPR analysis finds female GPs are earning on average £40,000 a year less than their male colleagues due to broken ‘two-tier system’
New IPPR analysis of official NHS workforce data has revealed the gender pay gap for General Practitioners now stands at 35 per cent – the fifth largest pay gap of any profession in the UK as a percentage. This gap is also significantly higher than the overall NHS average pay gap of 17 per cent and the mean UK pay gap of 16.2 per cent. This would make the mean GP gender pay gap the fifth largest in the country.
On average a male GP earns an estimated £110,000 a year whilst female GPs earn on average an estimated £70,000 – a difference of £40,000. A gap of this size means female GPs earn just 65p for every £1 earned by a male GP.
The analysis found that women of every age and on every type of General Practice contract earn less than their male counterparts – meaning a woman of any age, grade and seniority can expect to earn less than their male peers.
The IPPR research indicates key factors underpinning the pay gap. First, women are more likely to work part-time than men. On average, women work an estimated 0.69 ‘FTE’ (Full-time equivalent), compared to men working 0.89 FTE. Second, women General Practitioners tend to be younger: 35 per cent of women are younger than 40, compared to 22per cent of men.
However, these trends are true of medicine more widely and do not fully explain the size of the general practice model. A worrying third factor in this disparity is due to the model of general practice known as ‘the partnership model’ which IPPR says it fears is creating a two-tier system in general practice.
Almost 80 per cent of male GPs are partners, who part own, run and deliver NHS primary care services. By contrast fewer than 50 per cent of female GPs are partners. Partner GPs can expect to earn considerably more salaried GPs, who are twice as likely to be women.
A partner GP could expect to earn around £109,000 a year on average, whilst a salaried GP earns on average £58,000 a year. The unequal distribution of men and women in partner and salaried contracts is a clear driver of unequal pay, according to IPPR.
According to IPPR, these findings put a significant onus on the government to review how women can be better supported in work, and how the current two-tier contract system can be urgently rectified. IPPR will be publishing further recommendations on the future of primary care later in the year as part of the IPPR Better Health and Care Programme.
Commenting on the findings, Chris Thomas, IPPR Health Research Fellow and lead author said:
“The GP pay gap is a shocking inditement of the inequality in medicine, and society more widely. As it stands, the general practice pay gap is the equivalent of a woman GP working for free between the August bank holiday weekend and Christmas. The onus is on government to use their majority to make sure general practice works, fairly, for all our hard-working medical professionals.
Clare Gerada, senior GP, former chairperson of the Royal College of GPs (RCGP) and member of the IPPR Better Health and Care Advisory Panel, said
“Equality is built into the DNA of the NHS: it’s free at the point of need for everyone when we need it most. It is therefore all the more concerning - though not a surprise to me - that gender inequality is this prevalent in general practice. We must do something about it. We need the talents of all GPs regardless of gender, race or background to be embraced if we are going to address the GP workforce crisis and deliver high quality care for all”
NOTES TO EDITORS
The IPPR analysis, Mind the GP, by Chris Thomas and Harry Quilter-Pinner is available for download at: http://www.ippr.org/blog/mind-the-gp
Table: GP gender pay gap by age and contract type
The pay gap is calculated as a mean using the most recent GP earnings and expenses data. This is weighted by PMS/GMS and by the age distribution of general practitioners, using the most recent workforce in general practice data release. Pay gap statistics in this press release are all quoted as a mean. Using the mean, as opposed to the median, increases the impact that extremely high or low pay will have on the final figure – in the case of GPs, this is likely to be small. In the most recent ONS statistics on the gender pay gap, the mean pay gap was 0.9 points lower than the median pay gap.
In 2018, IPPR released the report ‘The State of Pay: Demystifying the Gender Pay Gap’. This showed a large gender pay gap in the UK. It made key recommendations to close the gap, including a rethink by employers on policies around pay negotiation; a more structured approach to progression; encouraging men to work more flexibly and for employers to publish narrative reports alongside their pay gap reporting. It is available to read here: https://www.ippr.org/publications/the-state-of-pay
IPPR is the UK’s pre-eminent progressive think tank. With more than 40 staff in offices in London, Manchester, Newcastle and Edinburgh, IPPR is Britain’s only national think tank with a truly national presence www.ippr.org
Latest News from
Kings Fund - Public satisfaction with the NHS rose sharply in 201907/04/2020 10:35:00
New analysis published by The King’s Fund and the Nuffield Trust shows public satisfaction with the NHS jumped to 60 per cent across the UK in 2019, up 7 percentage points from the year before.
COP26 Postponed: Right decision, but the UK mustn’t ignore its climate targets or leadership role, says IPPR07/04/2020 09:35:00
Plan for the post-Covid-19 crisis economic recovery must be for a low carbon ‘clean recovery’
IEA - Government jobs scheme gives business “wrong incentives”02/04/2020 13:35:00
IEA responds to figures from the British Chambers of Commerce
IFS - Fast choices by government provide generous income support to most workers, but leave some with nothing and others with too much02/04/2020 12:35:00
The government is running two large schemes – the Job Retention Scheme (JRS) for employees and the Self-employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) for the self-employed – and providing more generous benefits in an attempt to protect workers against income losses resulting from the coronavirus.
Adam Smith Inst - Testing times in this coronavirus crisis02/04/2020 11:35:00
A new report by the Adam Smith Institutes argues that if the UK had followed the USA's CDC in allowing private lab testing, and stopped confirmatory testing at a single site (Colindale) then we could have ramped up testing to the same per capita level as those three countries have done.
National Minimum Wage hikes could prove “unsupportable,” says IEA expert02/04/2020 10:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: “The decision to raise the National Living Wage by an unprecedented 6.2%, and other minimum wages by significant amounts, always risked scuppering employment growth, particularly in poorer regions where arbitrary wage hikes could offset the government’s plans to boost investment and jobs.
IFS - For sale: £45 billion of gilts02/04/2020 09:35:00
The Debt Management Office announced that from next Monday, it would be conducting additional gilt auctions in order to raise a total of £45 billion this month.
IEA - Most workers confined to home unable to work productively, report reveals31/03/2020 11:35:00
No more than 15% of healthy workers confined to their homes will work productively, argues new research from the Institute of Economic Affairs.
Covid-19: Emergency support package needed to save ‘children of the pandemic’ from becoming its unseen victims - IPPR31/03/2020 10:35:00
Right to paid parental leave, extra family cash, help accessing online learning and priority use of parks ‘essential’ to protect children from widening poverty, education and health gaps