Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Learndirect case highlights 'too big to fail' concerns in Government contracting
The Public Accounts Committee report urges action in wake of apparent special treatment given to 'inadequate' further education provider.
- Read the report summary
- Read the report conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: The monitoring, inspection and funding of Learndirect Ltd.
Learndirect performance on apprenticeships in steep decline since 2013
With the collapse of Carillion, questions are rightly being asked about how Government manages companies who deliver our public services.
The failure of Learndirect in delivering quality training to apprentices whilst receiving millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money—£121 million in the 2016/17 academic year alone—is another stark example of a poorly performing contractor and poor oversight by Government and its regulators. And another contractor with contracts across several Government Departments.
Learndirect Ltd’s performance on apprenticeships has been in steep decline since 2013. Learndirect failed to address its under-performance, and has failed to act in the best interests of learners.
Ofsted rated Learndirect 'inadequate'
Ofsted had concerns about Learndirect Ltd in spring 2015, but despite the company’s 75,000 learners making it the UK’s largest commercial further education provider, Ofsted decided not to inspect until November 2016. Even then, Ofsted accepted the potential sale of part of the company as a reason to postpone its inspection, and only finally inspected in March 2017.
When Learndirect Ltd found that it had been rated as ‘inadequate’, it launched a legal challenge which delayed publication of the inspection report. The judge ruled fully in Ofsted’s favour, and the report was finally published in August 2017.
Too big, and too important to be allowed to fail?
The Department for Education would normally cancel an ‘inadequate’ provider’s contract and withdraw its funding almost immediately. But Learndirect Ltd threatened that such a course of action would harm its learners and jeopardise its ability to deliver other key government contracts.
The company continues to function, and expects to receive over £105 million of funding from its main government contracts in 2017/18. This apparent special treatment clearly begs the question of whether Learndirect Ltd was too big, and too important to government, to be allowed to fail.
The Government needs to learn lessons from the failure of its contractors and, particularly where a company holds contracts across several Departments, ensure it has a grip on how these companies are performing.
Comment from Committee Chair, Meg Hillier MP:
"Outsourcing is an abiding interest for our Committee but recent events have brought concerns about Government’s relationship with its contractors into sharp focus.
In the case of Learndirect, thousands of learners have been let down amid poor oversight by Government and at significant public expense. There has been disruptive legal action and, finally, a scathing Ofsted report. Yet still Learndirect appears to hold the whip hand.
It expects to receive over £105 million of funding from its main government contracts for this year, a consequence of assessments made about the risk to public services should Learndirect’s funding be terminated.
It cannot be right that individual contractors should command such large sums of public money regardless of their performance. No commercial provider should be allowed to become so essential to the delivery of services that it cannot be allowed to fail.
Government has a duty to manage taxpayers’ exposure to risk diligently and we urge it to act on the recommendations set out in our Report."
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Businesses face being left behind by transition to new technologies18/09/2019 16:05:00
Unless the Government steps up efforts to manage the transition to automation, entire regions of the UK face being left behind and British businesses could find themselves being uncompetitive, says the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee in a report published today.
English language tests: a systemic failure affecting thousands18/09/2019 14:25:00
The Home Office’s flawed reaction to a systemic failure by a private company has had a detrimental impact on the lives of over 50,000 overseas students the Home Office accused of cheating.
Value of Help to Buy uncertain18/09/2019 11:25:00
The housing market has been boosted and many helped into home ownership but a large proportion of those buyers did not require financial help
Committee publish new report on Planetary Health17/09/2019 14:25:00
‘Without rapid action to curb greenhouse gas emissions and efforts to safeguard the environment we risk causing irreversible damage to the planet. This is already having a significant and growing impact on human health, with impacts set to become more severe’ – Our Planet, Our Health
Arches sale not a good deal for taxpayers and tenants13/09/2019 12:25:00
Sale conducted well but we are unconvinced that it represents the best value for the taxpayer in the long term.
Too much secrecy over Brexit consultancy spend13/09/2019 11:25:00
The Public Accounts committee report says there has been excessive secrecy over the use of consultants by government, with confusion over how much is actually spent.
Immersive and addictive technologies report published13/09/2019 08:15:00
Call to regulate video game ‘loot boxes’ under gambling law and ban their sale to children among measures needed to protect players, say MPs. ‘Lack of honesty and transparency’ reported among representatives of some games and social media companies in giving evidence.
Fundamental shift away from single use packaging necessary, say MPs12/09/2019 16:15:00
The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee has today called for the government to focus on reducing all single use packaging – not just plastic – in its latest report on Plastic food and drink packaging.
Committee calls for research excellence to be spread across the UK12/09/2019 12:33:00
The Committee believes that research excellence needs to be encouraged outside of the ‘golden triangle’ of concentrated research funding (between London, Oxford and Cambridge) and recommends that UKRI significantly increase the size of the Strength In Places Fund to address this issue.