New sentencing guidelines for modern slavery offences published
The first sentencing guidelines for offences under the Modern Slavery Act 2015, including slavery, forced labour, human trafficking or an offence committed to facilitate human trafficking, were published today by the Sentencing Council following consultation.
Under the new guidelines, which apply to England and Wales, judges and magistrates will give severe penalties of up to 18 years to offenders in a leading role who expect substantial financial advantage and who expose victims to an extremely high risk of death. They come into effect on 1 October 2021.
Also in the guidelines:
- Offenders coerced or intimidated into committing slavery or human trafficking offences or are themselves victims, will have that fact recognised by the courts, which could see them receive comparatively lower sentences, where appropriate.
- The harm caused to victims may not always be obvious, and the guidelines direct the courts to make sure they consider all the facts of the case, even where a victim is unwilling or unable to give evidence.
There is also guidance on sentencing offenders convicted of committing an offence to facilitate a human trafficking offence, which proposes an uplift of up to two years to the sentence that would have been imposed for the underlying offending. The maximum penalty for this offence is 10 years, but where the underlying offence is kidnapping or false imprisonment, judges could impose life sentences.
Modern slavery offences, which come under the Modern Slavery Act (MSA) 2015, cover a broad range of offending, and the nature of the offences can differ. There are currently no sentencing guidelines for these offences.
The guidelines, which apply to adult offenders, cover the following offences:
- Holding someone in slavery, servitude and forced labour (section 1), including physical restraint or imprisonment, threats or treatment which make escape from their position an impossibility;
- Human trafficking – transporting people for purposes of exploitation (section 2), which may involve recruiting, harbouring, receiving or transferring people cross-border;
- Committing an offence with the intention of committing a human trafficking offence (section 4);
- Breach of a slavery and trafficking prevention order or a slavery and trafficking risk order (section 30).
Sentencing Council member, Rosina Cottage QC, said:
“Modern slavery targets vulnerable people who are exploited for financial gain by the offenders and can cause serious physical and psychological harm. Offending can take place over a long period of time, sometimes for years, and these new guidelines take account not only of the actions by the offender, but the impact on the victim.
“Offending can range from large-scale operations, with substantial financial gain, to offences carried out by offenders who are themselves victims either through coercion and intimidation and the sentencing range has been developed to reflect this.
“These guidelines will help to promote consistency of approach in this area, and to consolidate information that will assist courts to pass proportionate sentences when dealing with offenders convicted of modern slavery offences.”
The offence of human trafficking may involve recruiting, harbouring, receiving or transferring people across borders. But it can also be domestic, for example in cases of county lines trafficking and sexual assault.
Victims are typically vulnerable in some way, and while some may be physically restrained or imprisoned, others will be subject to threats and treatment which, combined with their vulnerability, make escape from their position an impossibility.
Notes to editors
- In addition to the offences in the new guidelines, MSA 2015 provides for various orders, including reparation orders, and slavery and trafficking risk and slavery and trafficking prevention orders, breach of which is a criminal offence.
- Sentencing guidelines must be followed, unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so. If a judge or magistrate believes that a guideline prevents the correct sentence from being given in an exceptional case, he or she can sentence outside of the guideline.
- Guidelines set sentencing ranges within the maximum for the offence as set out in current legislation.
- The Sentencing Council was established by Parliament to be an independent body, but accountable to Parliament for its work which is scrutinised by the Justice Select Committee. Justice Ministers are accountable to Parliament for the Sentencing Council’s effectiveness and efficiency, for its use of public funds and for protecting its independence. Judicial Council members are appointed by the Lord Chief Justice with the agreement of the Lord Chancellor. Non-judicial council members are appointed by the Lord Chancellor with the agreement of the Lord Chief Justice.
- For more information, please contact Kathryn Montague, Sentencing Council Press Office, on 020 7071 5792 / 5788 / 07912301657 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Latest News from
Totality guideline: exploring sentencers’ views28/09/2021 15:15:00
The Council has published research looking at the Totality guideline and how it is being used by sentencers. The research explores how useful judges and magistrates find the guideline, how easy it is to apply and where sentencers would like to see changes.
Miscellaneous amendments to sentencing guidelines13/09/2021 13:10:00
We have opened a consultation asking practitioners who use sentencing guidelines for their views on a series of proposed changes to existing guidelines.
Investigating the Sentencing Council’s impact in three key areas11/08/2021 12:10:00
As part of its tenth anniversary year, the Council undertook to investigate its impact in three key areas
Publication of modern slavery offences data tables11/08/2021 11:10:00
The Sentencing Council has published data tables, detailing recent sentencing trends for modern slavery offences.
Publication of unauthorised use of a trade mark data tables04/08/2021 14:10:00
The Sentencing Council has published data tables, detailing recent sentencing trends for the offence of unauthorised use of a trade mark.
Sentencing Council Annual Report 2020/2122/07/2021 10:10:00
The Sentencing Council Annual Report 2020/21, published yesterday, is the Council’s 11th annual report and Lord Justice Holroyde’s third as Chairman. The report documents the Council’s achievements of the year 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021, which include publishing four sets of definitive guidelines, all of which have come into effect, and consulting on three sets of draft guidelines.
Assessing harm in child sexual offences where there is no victim08/07/2021 09:20:00
Senior Policy Adviser, Ollie Simpson, explains why the Council is consulting on a harm assessment in child sexual offences that is based on what the offender intended to do
Ethnicity data: what we have and how we use it in developing guidelines25/06/2021 16:10:00
Jenna Downs, Senior Statistical Officer on the Council’s Analysis and Research team, explains why the Council has moved to using self-identified ethnicity data