Ombudsman issues rare further report into Medway Council
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has made the rare move to issue a further report because Medway Council has not implemented the Ombudsman's recommendations or followed the correct process to disagree with them.
The Ombudsman decided in September 2017 the council should provide school transport for a girl in its area because she was attending the nearest suitable school with places available.
The investigation found Medway’s Home to School Transport Policy did not comply with statutory guidance because it did not properly consider whether places were available at the nearest school. The council was asked to provide transport for the girl, reimburse her mother’s incurred costs taking her to school and review its school transport policy.
The council initially accepted the Ombudsman’s recommendations. It then decided not to revise its policy or backdate payment for some of the transport costs because, it argued, its transport policy is lawful. Medway did agree to provide transport from September 2017 because a previously unavailable footpath had come into use which meant the girl was now attending the nearest school.
When the council failed to comply with the remedy it had agreed, the Ombudsman issued a public interest report in March 2019. In that report, the council was criticised for not amending its policy or backdating the transport costs incurred. Medway was asked to implement the remedy it had already agreed, and make an additional payment to the family for the delay.
The council’s Cabinet considered the report, but refused to implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations, which the council had previously accepted. It did so based on a selective use of external advice and a flawed understanding of how it must respond to an Ombudsman decision.
The law says the council cannot now refuse to implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations because it disagrees with the Ombudsman’s original findings. Had it wished to challenge those findings, the only way to have done so was by judicial review of the initial decision made in September 2017.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:
“As the council decided it was not appropriate to challenge us by judicial review and it is now out of time to do so, it must accept our findings. Its response suggests it is attempting to reject the findings in our original decision, rather than the recommendations in the subsequent public interest report.
“The council will find, by looking at our casework, it is the exception to the rule in taking this procedurally flawed approach. I therefore call on it to familiarise itself with its duties and to put in place the changes I have recommended to ensure it complies fully with the process.”
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
1 in 5 mental health patients don’t feel safe in NHS care, Ombudsman finds20/02/2020 16:15:00
A new survey published yesterday by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman found that one in five people did not feel safe while in the care of the NHS mental health service that treated them.
Carolyn Hirst, Anu Singh and Linda Farrant join the Board as non-executive directors18/02/2020 14:15:00
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman are delighted to welcome Carolyn Hirst, Anu Singh and Linda Farrant to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's Board as non-executive directors.
Ombudsman reminds councils about care home top-up fees13/02/2020 09:15:00
Councils across England are being reminded by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman of their duties under the Care Act to administer ‘top-up fees’ for people contributing towards relatives’ care.
Luton to review some of its special educational needs services following Ombudsman’s investigation07/02/2020 14:15:00
Luton Borough Council has agreed to create a detailed action plan to improve some of its services for children with special educational needs after the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman uncovered significant concerns during a recent investigation.
Derby girl misses out on education because of council delays06/02/2020 12:15:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has criticised Derby City Council after a girl with autism missed out on around 18 months of special education support because of council delays.
Daventry District Council fails to tackle industrial noise complaint properly30/01/2020 09:15:00
Some homeowners on a new housing development in the Daventry area have been plagued by excessive noise from a nearby industrial estate because the district council has not done enough to investigate their concerns, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman reports.
Council makes serious unsubstantiated allegations about asylum seeker during Ombudsman investigation23/01/2020 12:15:00
Sandwell council refused to let a vulnerable mother have her representative present at an important meeting – and made serious and unsubstantiated allegations about both of them during an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Nottinghamshire man’s care package reduced because of financial pressures, Ombudsman finds23/01/2020 09:15:00
A Nottinghamshire man with autism was left relying on his parents to part-fund his care when the county council cut his package without identifying a suitable alternative, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.