Ombudsman reminds councils about care home top-up fees
Councils across England are being reminded by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman of their duties under the Care Act to administer ‘top-up fees’ for people contributing towards relatives’ care.
The warning comes after two councils – Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, and Lincolnshire County Council – disputed some of the Ombudsman’s recommendations against them.
Top-up fees are the difference someone (often a relative) chooses to pay for a loved-one’s stay in a care home over and above the amount the council has agreed to pay.
In the case of Dudley, the Ombudsman found the council, as standard practice, had been asking relatives to enter into an agreement with the care home to pay the amount, rather than administer the funding itself and claim the money from the relatives.
The Ombudsman asked the council to consider stopping this practice, however the council challenged the Ombudsman’s recommendations. It argued it would cost too much to administer the changes, and that it did not have to give the relative a choice of who to pay. It also argued that other councils continued to administer fees in the same way.
In Lincolnshire, the Ombudsman found the council did not give people the option to pay the top-up fee to the council. Again, the Ombudsman asked the council to review its procedures to give people the option of paying the top-up fees directly to the council.
Lincolnshire rejected the Ombudsman’s recommendations, again arguing it would cost too much to administer and that the use of agents – in this case, the care homes – to carry out the council’s functions was allowed.
The Care Act says that only with the consent of the people involved, and the care home, should someone pay a top-up fee direct to the care home. It also says this method is not recommended. By leaving top-up fee contracts to be agreed directly between people and care providers, it can potentially leave people vulnerable to the risk of fee increases. It also devolves the responsibility to collect any unpaid fees to the care provider sector.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, yesterday said:
“Councils are encouraged to administer the top-up fees, and recoup the money from relatives, because it gives the best security for vulnerable people living in care homes should there be any problems with payments.
“The reasons both councils have given for departing from the Guidance – the financial cost of doing things properly – is irrelevant. At the heart of the matter, we have two councils absolving themselves of their responsibilities to offer the public its basic protections set out in law.
“We also issued guidance to councils back in 2015 on administering these fees, and were quite clear that leaving the administration of top-up fees to care homes was wrong.
“I now call on both authorities to reconsider both my reports and make the necessary arrangements to ensure they comply with the recommendations I have set out.”
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In these cases, both councils have been asked to review their procedures on top-up fees to ensure they are in line with the Care Act.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Ombudsman annual review highlights widening cracks in council complaints systems28/07/2021 11:15:00
The ‘widening cracks’ in local government complaint handling are being highlighted in the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s annual review of complaints 2020-2021, published today.
Council to look again at summer-born children’s school start date requests26/07/2021 09:15:00
Leeds City Council failed to follow guidance on summer-born admissions when deciding when an August-born girl could start school, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Disabled boy missed out on education and support because of poor council practice20/07/2021 12:05:00
A West Sussex boy missed out on vital support because the county council decided he had the ‘wrong’ type of disabilities, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has reported.
Ombudsman raps council for taking too long to change care home charging policy16/07/2021 14:15:00
A Lincolnshire family has been forced to complain to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman for the second time about the way a relative’s care home fees were charged because the county council failed to improve its policies quickly enough.
London council to revise its social care charging policy following Ombudsman’s investigation15/07/2021 14:38:00
London Borough of Bexley has agreed to revise its social care charging policy after a man complained to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman about the way the authority increased its costs.
City of Wolverhampton Council to improve its adoption recruitment process08/07/2021 11:25:00
Wolverhampton council has agreed to ensure its adoption recruitment procedure adheres to statutory guidance, following an Ombudsman investigation.
Camden’s poor complaint response prompts further Ombudsman investigation01/07/2021 14:05:00
London Borough of Camden failed to carry out a recommendation to apologise to a man for its poor handling of a complaint, until the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman chased it for a response.
Birmingham to review school transport for children and young people following Ombudsman investigation25/06/2021 12:10:00
Birmingham City Council has agreed to revise its home to school transport policy and review all its decisions to issue a travel pass over the past three years following several complaints to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.