Rochdale council’s legal challenge rejected and it must now consider Ombudsman's recommendations
Councillors in Rochdale have been told to give proper consideration to a critical report about the way their council pays Special Guardians, after the council unsuccessfully challenged the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s decision and powers in the High Court.
In May 2019, the Ombudsman criticised Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council for underpaying Special Guardianship Allowances to a family in the area. However, instead of complying with the decision, the council challenged its findings in the High Court.
The High Court concluded the council’s policy was at odds with statutory guidance and the principles established in previous court cases, and that no rational explanation had been put forward to justify this. The basic principle was that fostering allowances should be used as the starting point for these payments, with means-tested reductions and adjustments as appropriate. The council’s challenge was dismissed in its entirety by the High Court and it has since had to pay the Ombudsman’s costs.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, yesterday said:
“The ability to scrutinise defective council policies goes to the heart of our work and it would have been a remarkable and regrettable erosion of our jurisdiction had this case been successful. The High Court has endorsed our decision and clearly rejected the council’s challenge
“Special guardianship orders offer invaluable stability to children who, for whatever reason, cannot live with their birth parents. We issued focus reports in 2013 and again in 2018 offering advice and guidance to councils on how they should support Special Guardians, after finding a number of families had not been treated fairly.
“Given the background to this case, we sincerely hope elected members will now honourably accept our recommendations to correct the council’s error and protect other families in the future.”
The case involved grandparents who had been granted a Special Guardianship Order to look after their grandchild, giving them responsibility for day-to-day decisions.
The grandparents complained because their allowance did not increase in line with the fostering allowance rates nor were they given the age band increase for the child, which they had been told they would receive.
The Ombudsman’s investigation found the council’s policy on paying the allowance, which had not been agreed by any formal committee, was not in line with statutory guidance, caselaw, or its own internal legal advice.
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. The report asked the council to calculate and backdate all Special Guardianship Allowance payments, for which the grandparents are eligible, to November 2013 (the publication date of the Ombudsman’s first focus report).
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case, the council should reconsider its policy for Special Guardianship Allowances in light of the statutory guidance, caselaw and the Ombudsman’s focus reports.
It should also identify other Special Guardians similarly affected and make backdated payments to them too.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
London council reviews Blue Badge assessment process following Ombudsman complaint14/08/2020 15:15:15
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham has agreed to review the way it assesses applications for the disabled ‘Blue Badge’ parking scheme after the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman found numerous failings in the way the council was running the scheme.
Council agrees to address its lack of suitable school transport for children with Special Needs14/08/2020 09:15:00
Buckinghamshire County Council has agreed to look at the transport it has available to take children with Special Educational Needs to school, after it left one mother out of pocket when she had no alternative but to take her child to school every day.
More systemic problems seen in Ombudsman complaints lead to increased wider service improvements30/07/2020 09:15:00
Increasing systemic problems seen in people’s complaints has led to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman making more wider service improvement recommendations to councils in 2019-20 than ever before.
Woman loses car because of failings by Merton enforcement agents24/07/2020 09:15:00
Merton enforcement agents acting on behalf of the local council wrongly seized a woman’s car – and her means of employment – when attempting to recover a debt, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Ombudsman highlights where councils can improve services to homeless people16/07/2020 16:15:00
Problems with the way councils are meeting new housing duties are making some homeless people’s situation worse, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Ombudsman paints stark picture of NHS complaint handling and launches public consultation to drive improvement16/07/2020 12:43:00
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman yesterday presented a report to Parliament painting a raw picture of an NHS complaints system in urgent need of reform and investment.
Homeless Haringey family left in bed and breakfast accommodation because of council errors09/07/2020 14:15:00
A Haringey mother of six has been living in bed and breakfast accommodation since February 2020 because her local council did not do enough to prevent her from becoming homeless, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.