Thousands of vulnerable Staffordshire people deprived of their liberty without proper assessment
Staffordshire County Council’s decision not to assess some vulnerable people who may have been unlawfully deprived of their liberty has been criticised in an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Certain assessments need to be carried out before depriving someone of their liberty can be authorised, if it is believed this is in the person’s best interests and necessary to protect them from harm. But in May 2016, Staffordshire County Council decided it would stop carrying out any assessments except those cases it classified as high priority.
At the time it made the decision, it was aware it would not be complying with relevant legislation and statutory guidance, but made the decision because of a lack of finances.
The council created its own guidance for ranking Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) requests into three priority bands. This was based on guidance issued by the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) regularly used by councils, but Staffordshire used an adapted version meaning fewer requests were categorised as high priority.
At the end of June 2018, the council had a backlog of 3,033 DoLS requests for which it had not carried out the relevant assessments, with some dating back to August 2014. Without the correct authorisation in place, there is a risk that people are being unlawfully deprived of their liberty.
Since May 2016 the council told the Ombudsman it has closed nearly 2,000 applications without assessment because a person had died before one could take place.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, yesterday said:
“We issued a focus report in 2017 highlighting the problems we were seeing in this area, and although we believe Staffordshire’s response is at the extreme end of the way councils are dealing with DoLS issues, I would urge others to look at how they are carrying out assessments to ensure they comply with relevant law and guidance.
“Resource constraints can never be a legitimate reason for not carrying out the assessments required by law or statutory guidance. While councils may decide how to prioritise cases, it is not acceptable that the only way low and medium priority applications are resolved is because the people involved move away or die.
“Because the council does not assess the majority of requests we simply do not know if there are people waiting in the backlog who are wrongly being deprived of their liberty when they actually have capacity, or when less restrictive options are available.
“Its decision may also have had an impact on those providing care – for example, when care providers need to liaise with the emergency services for someone they don’t have the right authorisations for.
“I now commend the council’s attempts to review its policies and tackle its backlog of requests and ask it to take on board my recommendations to ensure people are properly assessed before depriving them of their liberty.”
The Ombudsman decided to investigate this matter after investigating a complaint during which the council’s decision to focus the assessment process came to light.
In certain cases, the Ombudsman can investigate under the Local Government Act 1974, where it believes other people may have been caused an injustice. In this case the people who are likely to be affected are vulnerable, may not be aware of their rights to complain or go to court, and may not be able to complain, either in their own right or through representatives.
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. It also has the power to make recommendations to improve a council’s processes for the wider public. In this case, the council should produce an action plan for how it is going to deal with all incoming DoLS requests and the backlog of unassessed requests.
It should produce the action plan within three months of the amendment to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 being finalised by Parliament, taking into account any changes to the law and Government guidance.
The action plan should include a mechanism for addressing those cases where the request is eventually not approved, and an unlawful deprivation of liberty has had a potentially harmful impact on that person.
The council should also review the action plan should there be any further changes to the law or Government guidance.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Haringey and Islington councils criticised for how they recovered business rate debts17/10/2019 13:20:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has criticised two London councils for the way they tried to recover historic business rate debts.
Bexley council failed to learn from previous school transport complaints11/10/2019 11:15:00
London Borough of Bexley has been heavily criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after it failed to make agreed improvements to the way it decides school transport applications for children with disabilities.
Salford woman left without proper support because council failed to reassess her10/10/2019 17:08:00
A Salford woman with autism was left without proper support after the city council failed to review her care plan for more than five years, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Ombudsman responds to latest Independent Age report10/10/2019 09:15:00
Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, Michael King has responded to the latest Independent Age report, ‘Reviewing the case: The right to appeal in adult social care’.
A system in crisis? Ombudsman complaints about special educational needs at alarming level04/10/2019 13:05:00
Children with special educational needs and disabilities are increasingly being failed by the system designed to support them, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Motorists could have been denied right to challenge parking tickets in Cherwell26/09/2019 16:25:00
People parking in car parks run by Cherwell District Council’s contractor may have been denied their rights to challenge tickets through the courts, a Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman investigation has found.
Cancer treatment delays unacceptable, says Ombudsman25/09/2019 16:15:00
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) has found serious failings at Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust after the death of a man whose cancer surgery was unacceptably delayed.