Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Urgent reform needed to improve independence, accountability and performance of UK regulators
The Industry and Regulators Committee has raised significant concerns over the role of UK regulators, their ability to operate with genuine independence from Government, and how they are held to account.
- Report: Who watches the watchdogs? Improving the performance, independence and accountability of UK regulators (HTML)
- Report: Who watches the watchdogs? Improving the performance, independence and accountability of UK regulators (PDF)
- Inquiry: UK Regulators
- Industry and Regulators Committee
In its report, ‘Who watches the watchdogs? Improving the performance, independence and accountability of UK regulators’, the Committee concludes that a fresh approach to overseeing UK regulation is required, calling for the creation of an ‘Office for Regulatory Performance’ to investigate and report on regulators’ performance and support Parliament in holding regulators to account.
The Committee found that:
- Some regulators are being overloaded with objectives, without clear guidance on how they should prioritise between them;
- The waters have been muddied between regulatory and political issues, resulting in the Government’s strategic guidance effectively ducking decisions on which it should give a view;
- There is a perception that some regulatory leaders have been appointed on account of their political loyalty rather than their experience and capability;
- While some regulators can raise their own revenues through levies and charges, others depend on the Government for their funding, which inevitably influences their ability to carry out their functions independently;
- Regulators face a challenge to recruit and retain more specialised staff due to the higher rates of pay available for the same skills in the private sector, particularly in areas of rapid change such as digital and technological skills;
- It is crucial that regulators are held to account for how they use their powers by Parliament, but currently parliamentary scrutiny of regulators is reactive and piecemeal, rather than systematic and routine.
The Committee is calling on the Government to:
- Streamline regulators’ duties and objectives and provide prioritisation in the event of conflicts;
- Provide guidance on how policy priorities should be decided, for example on matters of social or economic policy, such as the size of bills, and give regulators’ boards the power to seek explicit guidance on such decisions;
- Allow Parliament to play a more prominent role in scrutinising appointments to regulators, and provide a public explanation if it chooses to make an appointment that has not been endorsed by the relevant select committee;
- Consider allowing relevant regulators the power to raise their own revenues;
- Allow regulators greater discretion to move outside of current payscales to attract the necessary staff;
- Ensure the consumer view is properly heard by regulators, by expanding statutory provisions for independent consumer advocacy;
- Provide Parliament with the resources necessary to establish a new body, the Office for Regulatory Performance, to support its scrutiny of regulators.
Lord Hollick, Chair of the inquiry, said:
“Our report raises concerns about the functioning of the three-way relationship between the regulators, the Government, and Parliament, particularly the role and performance of regulators, their independence, and their accountability. We are especially concerned at cases where the Government has failed to resolve political or distributional questions facing regulators, and instead interfered in their day-to-day workings.
“Independent regulators must have the confidence to tell the Government and the public about the serious problems facing their sector and be able to set out proposals to meet them with clarity, efficiency and transparency.
“Ministers and Departments responsible for specific regulators should be subject to scrutiny alongside these regulators. We were therefore disappointed by the limited engagement in our inquiry by the Department for Business and Trade, particularly when transparency and accountability to Parliament were a central theme of our work. The Department did not provide the Committee with oral ministerial representation, despite ample notice, and its written submission was brief and lacked detail.
“If the integrity and legitimacy of the UK’s regulatory system is to be preserved, the findings and recommendations in our report must be addressed by the Government, regulators and Parliament.”
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Parliament must vote on Pacific trade deal before the UK joins, Committee says20/02/2024 11:25:00
MPs on the Business and Trade Committee have called for the Government to allow lawmakers a debate and a vote on joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) trade bloc.
Homecare medicines services: an opportunity lost—Lords committee ask Government for clarification19/02/2024 11:25:00
In November 2023, the Public Services Committee published its report into the Homecare medicines services provision and raised its concerns about the sector.
Procedure and Privileges Committee publishes Second Report13/02/2024 12:05:00
The Committee has proposed a new Standing Order which, if agreed by the House, would temporarily exclude from the parliamentary estate any member who had been formally charged with a serious violent or sexual offence.
Chair Comment: Reform of dental contract ‘missing piece’ from government recovery plan08/02/2024 13:05:00
Health and Social Care Committee Chair Steve Brine MP yesterday responded to the publication of the government’s Plan to Recover and Reform NHS Dentistry.
Bank of England has taken a leap in the dark on quantitative tightening, Treasury Committee concludes07/02/2024 14:05:00
The Treasury Committee concludes the Bank of England’s programme of active quantitative tightening is a leap in the dark as the Bank has not been able to fully consider the broader economic consequences.
AI regulatory gap analysis a welcome first step towards addressing AI governance challenges, says Committee Chair07/02/2024 13:05:00
Following the publication of a command paper setting out the Government’s plans for artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, the Chair of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, Rt Hon Greg Clark MP, has welcomed further details of its intended approach.
The UK’s electric vehicle strategy needs a rapid recharge says Lords Committee06/02/2024 15:25:00
The Environment and Climate Change Committee has published its report 'EV strategy: rapid recharge needed'.
Financial Reporting and Audit in Local Authorities - Levelling-Up Committee publishes Government response06/02/2024 13:05:00
The Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (LUHC) Committee yesterday published the Government’s response to the Committee’s report on Financial Reporting and Audit in Local Authorities.