Care Quality Commission
Act Action required to address longstanding concerns about care of people subject to the Mental Health Act
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has found that some patients who are subject to the Mental Health Act continue to experience care that does not fully protect their rights or ensure their wellbeing.
While CQC found individual examples of good practice, the quality regulator has concluded that mental health services are not doing enough to ensure that people whose liberty has been restricted under the Mental Health Act are able to exercise their rights; and that this situation is not improving.
Throughout the year, CQC has carried out visits to mental health inpatient services to meet patients, review their care and speak to staff on the frontline of care.
In its annual report to Parliament on how health services in England are applying the Mental Health Act and responding to the wider challenges for the mental health sector, CQC has concluded that there has been:
- No improvement in aspects of care-planning that are important to supporting the recovery of patients and their discharge from inpatient services. These include involving patients in developing their care plans (32% found no evidence); making sure the views of patients are considered (31% found no evidence); whether clinicians had considered less restrictive options for supporting patients (17% found no evidence); or, making a record of the plans for discharging patients back home (24% found no evidence).
- One in ten records showed that people had not been informed of their legal rights on admission.
- Despite the importance of physical health checks for people with serious mental illness, CQC found that 8% of people reviewed had not had a physical health check completed when they were admitted to a psychiatric ward.
These problems are longstanding and they have been raised by the quality regulator in its previous reports to Parliament.
The publication of CQC’s report comes as an independent review of the Mental Health Act is underway. This is an opportunity for these concerns to be addressed. In particular, the review, which is being led by Prof Sir Simon Wessely, could consider whether the requirement on managers to ensure that staff comply with their duties to inform patients and involve them in care decisions should be strengthened.
Dr Paul Lelliott, deputy chief inspector of hospitals (lead for mental health) at the Care Quality Commission, said:
“Mental health has never been higher on the national agenda and more people than ever are receiving treatment and care for their problems. The number of people detained in hospital under the Mental Health has continued to rise over the course of the current decade. We know from our inspections that services are having to respond to this unprecedented challenge.
“We encourage individual providers and commissioners to review their practice against our findings and to address the long-running issues that we flag up every year. Managers of mental health providers should understand how the Act is being used locally, and use this intelligence to improve their services. This is a feature of an organisation that is well led.
“We support the independent review of mental health legislation, which is being carried out by Prof Sir Simon Wessley. We welcome the fact that his review will also consider the wider practice and service factors that might underpin some of our findings. This is quite likely to be a ‘once in a generation’ review and our report on the Mental Health Act allows us to share the themes from the thousands of interviews we complete with people currently subject to the Act in hospital every year.
“We hope that the evidence from people with a direct experience of the Act will serve as an important lever for improvement in some the areas of concern that we have highlighted in our regulation and monitoring work of mental healthcare across England.
“As the quality regulator, we will continue to play our part in highlighting good practice, encouraging improvement and acting on behalf of people so that everyone gets the help they need, when they need it.”
The Mental Health Act 1983 is the legal framework that authorises hospitals to detain and treat people who have serious mental health needs and who are putting their own health or safety, or of other people, at risk of harm. CQC has a duty to monitor and report on how services do this.
As part of its work to monitor the Act, CQC carried out 1,368 visits to mental health wards from April 2016 to March 2017 and spoke to thousands of patients and their representatives to discuss how the Mental Health Act and its Code of Practice (national guidance that explains how professionals should carry out their responsibilities under the Mental Health Act) were being applied to them.
As well as this, CQC received 2,353 complaints and enquiries about the way the Mental Health Act was applied to patients and CQC Mental Health Act Assessors requested 6,475 actions to change the way care was being delivered to providers.
For media enquiries about the Care Quality Commission, please call the press office on 020 7448 9401 during office hours.
Also, follow the team on Twitter for the latest national announcements: @CQCPressOffice.
Journalists wishing to speak to the press office outside of office hours can find out how to contact the team here: www.cqc.org.uk/media .(Please note: the duty press officer is unable to advise members of the public on health or social care matters).
For general enquiries, please call 03000 61 61 61.
Notes to editors
Read the full Monitoring the Mental Health Act in 2016/17 report.
Further information about CQC's report on The state of care in mental health services, 2014 to 2017.
Further information on CQC’s report on the rise in the use of the Mental Health Act to detain people in England.
Further information about the independent review of the Mental Health Act, which is being chaired by Professor Sir Simon Wessely.
About the Care Quality Commission
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the independent regulator of health and social care in England.
We make sure health and social care services provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and we encourage care services to improve.
We monitor, inspect and regulate services to make sure they meet fundamental standards of quality and safety and we publish what we find to help people choose care.
Latest News from
Care Quality Commission
CQC calls for improvements to oral health in care homes24/06/2019 14:20:00
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has today published the findings of an in-depth review on the state of oral health care in care homes across England.
Update on independent review into regulation of Whorlton Hall20/06/2019 14:20:00
CQC has commissioned clinical psychologist Professor Glynis Murphy to undertake an independent review of its regulation of Whorlton Hall between 2015 and 2019.
Stories of improvement from eight independent hospitals19/06/2019 15:20:00
CQC yesterday published a report that explores how eight independent acute hospitals have been able to make significant improvements in the quality of care and improve their CQC rating on re-inspection.
CQC shares previously unpublished findings of 2015 inspection of Whorlton Hall11/06/2019 13:25:00
Ian Trenholm and Dr Paul Lelliott will be appearing before the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) on Wednesday 12 June to answer questions about CQC’s regulation of Whorlton Hall.
CQC launches new Equality Objectives for 2019-2106/06/2019 14:20:00
We have now confirmed our Equality Objectives for 2019-21. These objectives ensure that equality is front and centre, both in our regulatory work, and for our staff.
Medicines in health and adult social care: Learning from risks and sharing good practice for better outcomes06/06/2019 13:20:00
Our new report describes lessons for better medicines optimisation across health and social care providers and the positive impact of involving pharmacy professionals in health and social care settings.
Independent review into regulation of Whorlton Hall03/06/2019 09:20:00
CQC has commissioned David Noble QSO to undertake an independent review into how it dealt with concerns raised by Barry Stanley-Wilkinson in relation to the regulation of Whorlton Hall.
CQC calls for action to fix the closed system that leads to people with a learning disability or autism being segregated in hospital21/05/2019 15:20:00
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is calling for an independent review of every person who is being held in segregation in mental health wards for children and young people and wards for people with a learning disability or autism.
What do the forthcoming elections mean for CQC?10/04/2019 14:05:00
With local elections on 2 May, you may have heard about public bodies, like CQC, having to respect a ‘pre-election period’, which places certain restrictions on what we’re allowed to publish and announce in the period before an election. What we can continue during the pre-election period is our ‘business as usual’ activity – delivering our regulatory role.