CJEU: The UK can require recipients of child benefit & child tax credit to have a right to reside in the UK
The regulation on the coordination of social security systems lays down a series of common principles to be observed by the legislation of the Member States in that sphere so that the various national systems do not place at a disadvantage persons who exercise their right of freedom of movement and of residence within the EU. One of the common principles that the Member States must observe is the principle of equality. In the specific field of social security, the principle of equality takes the form of prohibiting any discrimination on grounds of nationality.
The Commission received numerous complaints from non-British EU citizens resident in the UK. They complained that the competent UK authorities had refused to grant them certain social benefits on the ground that they did not have a right to reside in the UK. Since the Commission took the view that the UK legislation does not comply with the regulation, it brought an action for failure to fulfil obligations against the UK. The Commission stated that under UK legislation it must be verified that persons claiming certain social benefits – including family benefits such as child benefit and child tax credit, which the present case concerns – are lawfully resident in the UK. According to the Commission, that condition is discriminatory and contrary to the spirit of the regulation since the regulation has regard only to the claimant’s habitual residence.
In response to those arguments, the UK, which relies on the judgment in Brey, 3 maintains that the host State may lawfully require that social benefits be granted only to Union citizens who fulfil the conditions for possessing a right to reside in its territory, conditions which are, essentially, laid down in an EU directive.4 Furthermore, while acknowledging that the conditions conferring entitlement to the social benefits at issue are more easily satisfied by its own nationals (as they have, by definition, a right of residence), the UK maintains that in each case the condition requiring a right of residence is a proportionate measure for ensuring that the benefits are paid to persons sufficiently integrated in the UK.
In today’s judgment, the Court dismisses the Commission’s action
Latest News from
Let us know what you think: EUIPO User Satisfaction Survey launched today16/01/2018 13:25:00
Every year EUIPO carries out a satisfaction survey to identify goals and priorities for improvement, as well as to assess the satisfaction of our users with the services we provide.
Payment services: Consumers to benefit from cheaper, safer and more innovative electronic payments15/01/2018 16:25:00
The revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2), which will apply as of 13 January 2018, aims to modernise Europe's payment services to the benefit of both consumers and businesses, so as to keep pace with this rapidly evolving market.
PRAC recommends suspending hydroxyethyl-starch solutions for infusion from the market15/01/2018 14:20:00
Review finds measures to protect patients have not been sufficiently effective.
Public consultation: guidance on nanomaterials15/01/2018 13:10:00
EFSA has opened a public consultation on its draft guidance for the risk assessment of nanoscience and nanotechnology applications in the food and feed chain. The guidance covers the relevant areas within EFSA’s remit, such as novel foods, food contact materials, food and feed additives, and pesticides.
ESMA raises concerns on fees charged by CRAs and Trade Repositories12/01/2018 15:10:00
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a Thematic Report on fees charged by Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) and Trade Repositories (TRs), following the conclusion of ESMA’s supervisory review of the current fee structures in the credit rating and trade repository industries.