Getting to a New Iran Deal: A Guide for Trump, Washington, Tehran, Europe and the Middle East
In the context of recent developments, this paper reviews US President Donald Trump’s Iran strategy and explores possible pathways to a new nuclear agreement with the Islamic Republic.
The flags of the EU, Iran, France, Germany and the UK are pictured before meetings on 15 May 2018 in Brussels, Belgium, in response to the US’s announcement of its withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal. Photo: Getty Images.
- This paper assesses the impact of US President Donald Trump’s campaign of ‘maximum pressure’ against Iran, and the potential for future negotiations. It draws on 75 off-the-record interviews with policymakers and analysts in 10 countries (the US, Iran, France, Germany, the UK, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Israel).
- Respondents generally did not foresee a ‘grand bargain’ on Iran as a viable outcome of the US strategy. Their scepticism reflected in part the Trump administration’s execution and implementation of a zero-sum, sanctions-focused strategy, and its limited understanding of Iran’s decision-making priorities and national interests. Interviewees suggested the current stand-off would not result in Washington’s sought-after results.
- The maximum-pressure strategy has produced greater regional instability and anxiety among the US’s regional partners, resulting in a loss of US credibility in Europe and the Middle East. The unilateral US approach has not only created divisions with Europe over Iran policy, but has also allowed Russia and China to exploit this disunity to further their own economic and political interests. As evidenced by European efforts to save the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), in the face of increasing Iranian pressure for economic benefits, Tehran has also been deftly turning these divisions to its advantage.
- Tehran’s position is complicated by domestic dynamics. Iran has repeatedly demanded sanctions relief as a precursor to further negotiations. It will continue to do so until it receives some face-saving solution that would allow for more negotiations. At the same time, respondents repeatedly pointed out that Tehran’s calculations are not solely predicated on economic variables, but rather focused on protecting the longevity of the Islamic Republic and shifting regional and international policy away from containment of Tehran.
- Respondents saw a ‘JCPOA+’ model as the best outcome of the current stand-off. A new agreement along these lines would offer improvements on the original JCPOA, including extensions to its sunset clauses, greater International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) access to nuclear sites, expanded monitoring and verification of Iranian compliance, and codification of stated constraints on intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).
- Interviewees widely agreed that regional issues – including Iranian support for state and non-state actors in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen – and Iran’s pattern of ballistic missile proliferation can only be addressed via a multilateral, European-led negotiation. For most respondents, Europe is one of the few actors with the credibility to manage relations across the region.
- For regional actors such as Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), outsourcing the containment of Iran has proven ineffective. Instead, governments in these countries should consider crafting independent bilateral outreach, and a multilateral regional strategy that does not rely solely on containment but also includes engagement.
This interactive map provides more detailed access to the data, the prospective scenarios and the individual country positions on nuclear, ballistic missile and regional solutions.
Latest News from
South Asia's Turn to Illiberal Democracy18/11/2019 15:10:00
In Sri Lanka, the Rajapaksa brothers' return confirms the region's autocratic drift.
Climate, Food and Land14/11/2019 14:25:00
Tim Benton reflects on the relationship between land, food and climate change, and considers the challenges created by competing demands for the services land produces.
Brexit in a Historical Context: Pursuing a Global Vision at the Expense of Domestic Harmony?13/11/2019 09:20:00
The panel discusses how the notion, and rhetoric, of ‘Global Britain’ fares against different readings of Britain’s international history.
Five Lessons From the New Arab Uprisings12/11/2019 12:15:00
Georges Fahmi examines how protesters across the region have adapted their tactics after the experiences of the Arab Spring.
Why We Build Walls: 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall11/11/2019 13:20:00
Robin Niblett recently (08 November 2019) talked to Gitika Bhardwaj about the physical and psychological significance of border walls and their role in politics.
Why Britain’s 2019 Election Is Its Most Unpredictable in Recent History11/11/2019 09:20:00
Leadership concerns and a collapse of traditional party loyalties make the December vote uncommonly volatile.
Is Raissouni's Pardon Simply Playing Politics in Morocco?05/11/2019 12:20:00
Under pressure from both Islamist and secular groups - and the wider world - the decision to release a journalist looks like an attempt by Morocco's regime to restore control.
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi: What His Death Means For ISIS in Syria29/10/2019 12:20:00
Following the announcement of the death of ISIS group leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in a US military raid, Lina Khatib explains what is likely to happen next.