Care Quality Commission
National survey highlights decline in people’s experience of urgent and emergency care
Findings from a survey of more than 36,000 people who used NHS urgent and emergency care services in September 2022 show that many people had a worse experience than in previous years – particularly those treated in an A&E type department.
Published recently (Tuesday 25 July) by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the survey reveals the responses from patients who attended either a major consultant-led A&E department (Type 1) or an urgent treatment centre or minor injury unit (Type 3) run directly by one of 122 acute hospital trusts in England during September 2022.
Although people surveyed remained broadly positive about their interactions with staff, this year’s results show a decline in positivity for every question asked where a historical comparison is available.
Most people (80%) surveyed who had visited a Type 3 department said they ‘definitely’ had enough time to discuss their condition with the healthcare professionals treating them (down from 85% in 2020), and a large number (84%) of those who used a Type 3 service said that staff ‘definitely’ listened to what they had to say (no significant change compared to previous years).
For respondents who had attended a Type 1 department in 2022, 73% felt that doctors and nurses ‘definitely’ listened to them, compared with 79% in 2020. And over two thirds (71%) said they ‘definitely’ had confidence and trust in staff - which is still high, but a lot lower than the 77% who said this in 2020.
Responses to questions about other aspects of care including fundamental issues like waiting times, availability of staff, pain management and information provided at discharge showed an even more marked decline.
The number of Type 1 patients who reported waiting more than an hour to first speak to a doctor or nurse increased to 32% in 2022 (compared with 15% in 2020 and 19% in 2018). And in 2022, the proportion who said they waited more than 4 hours to be examined in a Type 1 service more than trebled to 17% - up from 4% in 2020 and 5% in 2018. Over half of patients (56%) who said that they needed help with their condition or symptoms while they were waiting to be treated in A&E said they were not able to get that help from staff (up from 45% in 2020).
In Type 3 services, 10% of people with an appointment said they waited more than 2 hours to first speak with a health professional (compared with 3% in 2020 and 4% 2018), and 15% percent of those with an appointment said they waited more than 2 hours to be examined (up from 5% in 2020 and 3% in 2018).
Only 57% of Type 1 patients said that they were ‘definitely’ involved as much as they wanted to be in decisions about their care and treatment in 2022 - compared to 63% who said this in 2020 and 65% who said this in 2018. Similarly, there was a decline in the number of people who said if they had any anxieties or fears about their condition or treatment, a doctor or nurse in the A&E department ‘completely’ discussed this with them – falling from 51% in 2020 to 48% in 2022.
Across both service types, less than half (45% of Type 1 respondents and 49% of Type 3 respondents) felt that they ‘definitely’ had enough privacy when discussing their condition with the receptionist. This compares with 55% and 59% for Type 1 and Type 3 services in 2020. And fewer Type 1 patients ‘definitely’ had enough privacy when being examined and treated - 78% in 2022 compared with 84% in 2020.
Only 53% of Type 1 patients and 69% of Type 3 patients who had communication needs (language needs or communication needs related to a disability, sensory loss, or impairment) said staff ‘definitely’ helped with their needs - with 27% of Type 1 patients and 20% of Type 3 patients with those needs reporting that staff gave them no help.
Pain management was another area of care highlighted as an increased concern. Fifty-one per cent of Type 1 respondents and 58% of Type 3 respondents felt that staff ‘definitely’ did everything they could to help control their pain. This compared with 60% and 63% for Type 1 and Type 3 services in 2020.
As has been the case in previous years, the 2022 results also showed scope for improvements at discharge from both A&E and Type 3 departments. Only 46% of Type 1 patients surveyed said they were ‘completely’ told what symptoms to watch for when they were at home (down from 53% in 2020) and 51% of Type 1 patients and 65% of Type 3 patients were ‘definitely’ given enough information to care for their condition after leaving the department. This is compared with 60% and 70% for Type 1 and Type 3 services in 2020.
People surveyed who had attended A&E were more likely to report a negative experience of care if they identified as frail, if they were disabled, if their visit lasted longer than 4 hours or if they had been to the same A&E for the same condition within the previous week.
Dr Sean O’Kelly, CQC’s Chief Inspector of Healthcare, recently said:
“These latest survey responses demonstrate how escalating demand for urgent and emergency care is both impacting on patients’ experience and increasing staff pressures to unsustainable levels. Staff are working extremely hard amidst challenging circumstances. We see that reflected in these results, but also during our inspections and monitoring of services and in the discussions with clinicians in CQC’s emergency medicine specialist advisor forum.
“The last urgent and emergency survey was carried out shortly before the second peak of the pandemic when A&E and Type 3 attendances were significantly lower than pre Covid levels – so the decline in positive feedback compared to then must be seen in that context. But it remains extremely concerning that for some people care is falling short, and we cannot afford to ignore the long term decline shown in relation to issues like waiting times, information provided when people leave to go home, access to pain relief and emotional support.
“As we made clear in our annual State of Care report last year, the rise in demand for urgent and emergency care and challenges staff face in meeting that demand is a symptom of a much wider capacity and access issue across health and social care. Urgent and emergency care requires the support of the whole hospital and the surrounding local health and social care system. Without that support and without a more co-ordinated approach, more and more people whose needs can be better met by other services will continue to seek help at emergency departments and urgent care centres.
“I encourage NHS trusts to reflect on their individual results to identify what changes they might be able to make to help drive improvements, and to use CQC’s People FIRST online resource as a support. But there is also a wider and very urgent need for Integrated Care Systems to ensure that local services are set up in a way that is designed around the needs of the population they serve, and that those services are supported to come together to help manage the increasing demand and ensure the best quality of care for all.”
In addition to a report on the findings for England, CQC has published the results for each of the 122 individual trusts that took part so that people can see how their local services performed, and a report identifying those trusts that have performed better or worse across the survey overall.
CQC will continue to use the findings as part of its wider monitoring of the quality of hospital services and to plan and target its inspections.
About the Care Quality Commission
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the independent regulator of health and social care in England.
We make sure health and social care services provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and we encourage care services to improve.
We monitor, inspect and regulate services to make sure they meet fundamental standards of quality and safety and we publish what we find to help people choose care.
Latest News from
Care Quality Commission
Starting our local authority assessments – updated guidance published08/12/2023 15:05:00
Last month, we published the findings of our 5 local authority pilot assessments and an update on our approach to formal assessments.
CQC registration and visa sponsorship for migrant workers08/12/2023 10:20:00
This week (4 December 2023), the Home Secretary James Cleverly gave a statement to the House of Commons on legal migration. In this statement he set out the requirement for "care firms in England to be regulated by the Care Quality Commission in order to sponsor visas".
Our new assessment approach: update December 202306/12/2023 13:10:00
We have now started our rollout of the new assessment framework in our South region and with 'early adopter' providers that volunteered to take part.
Local authority assessments – implementing our new approach17/11/2023 16:05:00
Completion of local authority pilot assessments
CQC reports on safe use of radiation in healthcare settings14/11/2023 15:20:00
CQC's annual report on our work to enforce the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations in England has been published.
CQC to lead on Independent Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews for 2 years10/11/2023 10:25:00
In 2019 we published our interim report ‘Out of Sight’ into restraint, prolonged seclusion and segregation for autistic people with and people with a learning disability.
Combination of cost-of-living crisis and workforce pressures risks ‘unfair care’ – longer waits, reduced access and poorer outcomes for some20/10/2023 15:15:00
The Care Quality Commission’s (CQC’s) annual assessment of the state of health and adult social care in England looks at the quality of care over the past year
Planning for winter pressures20/10/2023 12:20:00
Winter is always a challenging time for health and social care. Our recent blog discussed these challenges and our role in encouraging system working and maintaining standards of quality.
How we are testing our approach to integrated care system assessments28/09/2023 14:10:00
The assessment process has now started, and each pilot system has received a request for information from us. This is so we can collect the evidence that we need to review. As part of our assessment, we are speaking directly with people using health and care services and with staff working in the ICS about their experiences.