Printable version

Recent report published by HMICFRS: An inspection into how well the police and other agencies use digital forensics in their investigations

Police forces are reported to be overwhelmed and ineffective when it comes to digital forensics. 

Police forces are unable to keep pace with technology when it comes to digital forensics – and there is a backlog of more than 25,000 devices waiting to be examined, a new report has found.

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) examined how effective the police are at providing digital forensics – capturing evidence from a range of different digital devices, from smartphones to computers.

It was concluded that some forces were overwhelmed and were unclear of what digital forensics are. This has led to delays in examining devices – which has a negative impact on victims’ well-being and chances of a successful prosecution.

It was also found that there is no clear and coherent national plan for improvement.

There is no consistency for the service victims receive, with some forces starting digital forensic examinations within weeks of a crime bring reported – but for others is took 18months to begin examining evidence.

HMICFRS has made nine recommendations to help policing improve. These include:

  • an alternative operating model to provide effective and sustainable digital forensic services to support police investigations, designed by the Home Office, National Police Chiefs’ Council, College of Policing and the private sector;
  • appointing a national digital forensics policing lead to oversee a programme of improvement;
  • a Home Office review into digital forensics budget and future funding; and
  • an increase in the number of dedicated, competent and trained digital media investigators available to advise investigators and at crime scenes.

His Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary Matt Parr said:

“The rapid emergence of a digital society has created a huge opportunity for police to gather new types of evidence and identify criminals. But in our inspection, we didn’t see enough examples of policing making effective and efficient use of digital forensics.

“Many forces didn’t have a sufficient level of understanding of the work involved to recover evidence from mobile phones. Delays, lack of resources and lack of adequate training means some victims are being let down and officers are missing their chance to bring offenders to justice. During our inspection we found more than 25,000 devices waiting to be examined, and this doesn’t take into account all the devices already in the system.

“Some forces are showing promise, and we did see examples of good practice. But we found little evidence of this good practice being more widely shared and adopted by others. There is an enormous gulf in performance that cannot continue – it is unacceptable that victims in some force areas receive a significantly better service than others.

“The demand in digital crime will only continue to grow, so police leaders need to work with the Home Office and Crown Prosecution Service to tackle this immediately. Our report makes nine recommendations to address these issues. It is clear from our inspection that victims cannot afford to wait any longer for police to start taking this more seriously.”

You can read the report here.

Channel website:

Original article link:

Share this article

Latest News from

Latest Case Study: Multiple Mobile Networks on One Contract Delivering Efficiencies and Savings