The EC and Member States consumer authorities & social media companies to comply with EU consumer rules
EU consumer authorities & organisations have received a growing number of complaints from consumers, who have been targeted by fraud or scams when using social media websites, as well as having been subject to certain terms of services that do not respect EU consumer law.
On this basis, EU consumer authorities, under the leadership of the French consumer authority and with the support of the European Commission, sent a letter to Facebook, Twitter and Google+ last November asking them to address two areas of concern.
On Thursday 16 March, EU consumer authorities and the European Commission met with these companies to hear and discuss their proposed solutions. The companies in question will finalise detailed measures on how to comply with the EU regulatory framework within one month. The Commission and the consumer authorities will review the final proposals. If they are not satisfactory, consumer authorities could ultimately resort to enforcement action.
On the occasion, Commissioner Jourová said: "Social media has become part of our daily lives and a majority of Europeans use it regularly. Given the growing importance of online social networks it is time to make sure that our strong EU rules, that are there to protect consumers from unfair practices, are complied with in this sector. It is not acceptable that EU consumers can only call on a court in California to resolve a dispute. Nor can we accept that users are deprived of their right to withdraw from an on-line purchase. Social media companies also need to take more responsibility in addressing scams and fraud happening on their platforms. I want to thank the EU consumer authorities who have worked tirelessly with the Commission on this important issue over the past months. From today, social media companies have one month to come up with solutions to comply with EU rules."
Companies have agreed to propose changes focusing on two areas:
- Unfair terms and conditions;
- addressing fraud and scams that mislead consumers when using the social networks.
Clarification of terms or removal of illegal terms
Social media platforms' terms of services should be brought into conformity with European consumer law. Indeed, the Unfair Contract Terms Directive requires that standard terms which create a significant imbalance in parties' rights and obligations, to the detriment of the consumer (Article 3) are deemed unfair -and therefore invalid. The Directive also requires that terms are drafted in plain and intelligible language (Article 5) so that consumers are informed in a clear and understandable manner about their rights.
This means in practice that, amongst others:
- Social media networks cannot deprive consumers of their right to go to court in their Member State of residence;
- Social media networks cannot require consumers to waive mandatory rights, such as their right to withdraw from an on-line purchase;
- Terms of services cannot limit or totally exclude the liability of Social media networks in connection with the performance of the service;
- Sponsored content cannot be hidden, but should be identifiable as such;
- Social media networks cannot unilaterally change terms and conditions without clearly informing consumers about the justification and without given them the possibility to cancel the contract, with adequate notice;
- Terms of services cannot confer unlimited and discretionary power to social media operators on the removal of content.
- Termination of a contract by the social media operator should be governed by clear rules and not decided unilaterally without a reason.
Removing fraud and scams misleading consumers
Social media companies must remove any fraud and scams appearing on their websites that could mislead consumers, once they become aware of such practices. In this connection, national consumer protection authorities should have a direct and standardised communication channel to signal such wrongdoings to social media operators (for example infringing the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive or the Consumer Rights Directive) and obtain take down of content, as well as information concerning the traders responsible for the infringements. This is in line with EU consumer legislation and the E-Commerce Directive, which gives the possibility to Member States to establish procedures governing the removal or disabling of access to illegal information.
Here are examples of practices identified:
- scams involving payments taken from consumers;
- subscription traps where consumers are offered to register for a free trial but are not given clear and sufficient information;
- marketing of counterfeited products;
- fake promotions like "win a smart phone for 1 €" have proliferated over social media which were in fact a true contest but entailing a hidden long term subscriptions for several hundred euros per year.
The EU Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Regulations link national consumer authorities in a pan-European enforcement network. Thanks to this framework, a national authority in one EU country can call on their counterpart in another EU country to ask them to intervene in case of a cross-border infringement of EU consumer rules.
The cooperation is applicable to consumer rules covering various areas, such as the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, the E-commerce Directive, the Consumer Rights Directive or the unfair contract terms Directive.
The Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Network finalised a coordinated assessment of the problematic practices taking place in leading social media services (Facebook, Twitter and Google+) in an action led by the French Directorate General for Competition Policy, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) in November 2016, with the facilitation of the Commission. The trade association EDiMA was also contacted.
Latest News from
State aid: EC approves alternative to divestment commitment for Royal Bank of Scotland19/09/2017 14:10:00
The EC has approved under EU State aid rules the alternative package proposed by the UK authorities to replace the commitment for Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) to divest Williams & Glyn. The alternative package will increase competition in the UK SME banking market.
EC welcomes stakeholders' views on the future of EU finances19/09/2017 12:49:00
As part of the process started with the publication of the Reflection Paper on the Future of EU finances, the EC is organising on 25 September 2017 a conference on the challenges ahead of the EU budget and the ways to address them.
Juncker: ‘I don't intend to force countries to join the euro if they are not willing or not able to do so'18/09/2017 15:20:00
Jean-Claude Juncker, the President of the EC,has defended his proposal to expand the eurozone. All EU Member States should have the possibility to introduce the euro, but no one would be forced to do so, Juncker said on Thursday.
EMA concludes review of human factor VIII medicines authorised in EU.18/09/2017 13:20:00
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has concluded that there is no clear & consistent evidence of a difference in the incidence of inhibitor development between the two classes of factor VIII medicines: those derived from plasma and those made by recombinant DNA technology.
ESMA lays out procedure for ETDs access to CCPs under MiFID II18/09/2017 12:42:00
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has issued a procedure under Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) laying out the steps for trading venues to temporarily opt-out from access provisions for exchange-traded derivatives (ETDs).