Adam Smith Inst - Cash-strapped councils can count on planning reform
New paper identifies another way to grow Britain
- Government could unlock billions in extra funding for councils
- Councils should be allowed to buy land grant planning permission on it and then sell at higher value – capturing the uplift in value themselves
- Could bring in almost £30bn from the first million permits issued by cash-strapped councils
- This proposition would raise growth and revenues for local authorities; with no taxes imposed and no extra borrowing
Councils should be empowered by Government to purchase land, grant themselves planning permission and sell it on – with funds retained locally - the Adam Smith Institute argues today in a report released today.
The report’s author Dr Madsen Pirie, President of the Adam Smith Institute, says that devolving power to local councils to purchase land and grant themselves permission on it can deliver money into their coffers and bring a house building revolution.
The report argues that the Government should let councils buy land, grant it planning permission and then sell it off – benefiting from the corresponding increase in its value. This process could yield billions of pounds to pay for public services - £30bn from the first million units according to the paper’s estimates.
Land with planning permission is extremely scarce. One estimate found that an acre of land was worth £2,500 without planning permission and £4m with it. By granting permission to land they own, councils can capture the monetary benefits for themselves and their residents.
A further advantage of this new initiative is that it would clear the way for many new houses to be built where people want them – relieving the pressure on the housing market and enabling young people once again to aspire to home-ownership.
The paper says that by allowing councils to purchase land and grant themselves planning permission there would be no need to impose new taxes nor increase borrowing with a burden on future generations. It would, however, boost growth with the accelerated house-building programme it facilitated creating jobs. This in turn would increase tax revenues without the need to hike rates.
With austerity under attack from both the political establishment and the electorate it might be an opportune time to try a new approach. The paper argues the Government will find it extremely difficult to meet its spending commitments while softening some of its expenditures without seriously exploring options such as this.
Sam Bowman, Executive Director at the Adam Smith Institute, said:
“Right now, if you own a field that gets planning permission, you could stand to gain one or two hundred times in value what the field was originally worth. That massive uplift is called “planning gain” and the fact that local communities mostly don’t capture it is one reason they oppose new development so much – they only stand to lose from new houses being built near them.
“We need to change that. Not only would a system like the one we’re proposing make housebuilding much easier in the places it’s needed most, it would create a large and lucrative source of revenue for local government. That would truly be a win/win for everyone: more houses, more money for locals, and less of a drain on central government which can redirect some of the money saved to other areas.”
To read the full paper please click here.
For further comments or to arrange an interview, contact Matt Kilcoyne, Head of Communications, firstname.lastname@example.org | 07584 778207.
Latest News from
IEA: Labour Party is “wrong to focus purely on social housing”21/11/2019 15:35:00
Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs Dr Kristian Niemietz responded to Labour’s manifesto announcement, calling for the biggest council and social house building programme for decades
IEA - Merging taxes not “tinkering with NI thresholds” would better help low-paid21/11/2019 14:35:00
Editorial and Research Fellow Professor Len Shackleton responded to the Conservative Party’s announcement to raise the National Insurance threshold for workers
The King’s Fund responds to the Liberal Democrat manifesto21/11/2019 13:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King's Fund, commented on the Liberal Democrat manifesto
IEA responds to Liberal Democrats’ manifesto21/11/2019 12:35:00
Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs Mark Littlewood commented on the Liberal Democrats’ manifesto
Liberal Democrats Manifesto: A jump to the left on economics, says ASI21/11/2019 11:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute has responded to the Liberal Democrats Manifesto announcement.
Demos - Create a National Minimum Wage for the self-employed, says think tank21/11/2019 10:35:00
A new report from Demos looking at financial security for the modern, liquid workforce is calling for the next government to introduce a Self-Employed National Minimum Wage, as a crucial step towards improving financial security for lower paid self-employed workers.
IFS - Labour plans to raise income tax for 1.6 million people – the highest-income 3% of adults21/11/2019 09:35:00
The Labour Party has announced plans to introduce a 45% income tax rate on annual incomes over £80,000 and a 50% rate on incomes over £125,000 from 2020–21. New analysis by IFS researchers, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, examines the likely effects of this policy.
IFG - Costs of creating a new government department revealed19/11/2019 16:35:00
The incoming – or returning – prime minister may want to stamp his or her authority on government by rearranging departments, but new research lays bare the total costs involved in creating new departments.
Public demand “fundamental reform” of UK economy finds new poll for IPPR19/11/2019 15:35:00
IPPR/YouGov poll finds majority across party and Brexit divides in favour of significant changes to how the UK economy is run
The King's Fund responds to the General Medical Council's new report on the wellbeing of doctors19/11/2019 14:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, commented on a new report on the wellbeing of doctors commissioned by the General Medical Council