Information Commissioner's Office
Blog: Counting the cost of accessing environmental information
Blog posted by: Gill Bull, Director of Freedom of Information, 03 June 2019.
At the beginning of May, Parliament declared a ‘climate change emergency’ and concerns about the environment make news headlines almost every day. So it’s more important than ever that people are able to get the information they need to take part in informed debates.
A recent decision taken by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) will now make it easier for people to do so.
Alongside the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), the ICO also regulates the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR), which provides access to environmental information held by public authorities. This might include, for example, information about land development, pollution levels, energy production or waste management.
Unlike requests made under FOIA, which are generally free up to an ‘appropriate limit’ - £450 for local councils and £600 for central government organisations - the EIR says public authorities are allowed to charge a reasonable amount.
Public authorities must ask themselves what is a reasonable charge and when it is reasonable to make one. As you might expect, different authorities have many different answers to this question.
The ICO wants to reduce these inconsistencies and uncertainties to benefit both public authorities and members of the public.
We have published a decision notice on the issue of EIR charges finding that a charge of £325 imposed by Folkestone and Hythe District Council for accessing environmental information was unreasonable. The decision notice says that a useful starting point for considering whether a charge is reasonable is whether it falls under the ‘appropriate limit’ provided by FOIA.
Our guidance states that public authorities should avoid routinely charging for all EIR requests. Instead, they should weigh up the reasons behind the law and whether that cost may deter people from requesting information. This is in line with the clear judgement in the case of East Sussex County Council v Information Commissionerwhich found that a reasonable charge is one that would not have a deterrent effect.
Public authorities should bear in mind that the ICO may consider that a charge under the EIR is unreasonable where the cost of answering the request falls under the appropriate limit provided by FOIA.
We plan to follow this decision by publishing revised guidance later this year, emphasising the importance of avoiding charges that have a deterrent impact.
Access to information is an important right, and it’s vital that the financial cost of exercising that right does not prevent people from playing a full and informed part in the democratic debate about the future of our planet.
Gill Bull is Director of Freedom of Information at the Information Commissioner’s Office where she is responsible for the ICO’s FOI and Environmental Information Regulations casework, compliance and policy.
Latest News from
Information Commissioner's Office
Former motor industry worker ordered to pay £25,500 from proceeds of data theft18/07/2019 11:32:00
A motor industry employee who was sentenced to six months in prison in November 2018 for accessing personal data without permission, has been ordered to pay a £25,500 confiscation order in a case brought by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
Speech: The future of online advertising regulation12/07/2019 13:47:00
Simon McDougall, Executive Director for Technology Policy and Innovation’s speech at the Westminster Media Forum Keynote Seminar: The future of online advertising regulation.
Statement: Intention to fine Marriott International, Inc more than £99 million under GDPR for data breach10/07/2019 12:20:00
Statement given yesterday in response to Marriott International, Inc’s filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission that the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) intends to fine it for breaches of data protection law.
Blog: Live facial recognition technology - data protection law applies10/07/2019 09:10:00
Blog posted by: Elizabeth Denham, Information Commissioner, 09 July 2019.
ICO publishes annual report covering an ‘unprecedented’ year09/07/2019 15:51:00
The public has woken up to the potential of their personal data, the Information Commissioner has said as the ICO’s annual report for 2018-19 was published today. Elizabeth Denham also said it covered an ‘unprecedented’ year for the regulator.
ICO statement: Intention to fine British Airways £183.39m under GDPR for data breach08/07/2019 13:10:00
Following an extensive investigation the ICO has issued a notice of its intention to fine British Airways £183.39M for infringements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Blog: Cookies – what does ‘good’ look like?04/07/2019 12:25:00
Blog posted by: Ali Shah, Head of Technology Policy, 03 July 2019.
Former company director believed to have profited by more than £1.4 million after selling personal data illegally01/07/2019 12:25:00
A former company director found guilty of illegally obtaining people’s personal data and selling it to solicitors chasing personal injury claims, has been fined for breaches of data protection and issued with a confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
ICO searches Liverpool addresses as part of investigation into suspected illegal acquisition and sale of personal data28/06/2019 15:20:00
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) yesterday (27 June) searched two addresses in Liverpool, as part of an ongoing investigation into the acquisition and sale of illegally obtained personal data.