IEA - Lowering CEO pay would do nothing to help the average worker
IEA reacts to the High Pay Centre's 'Fat Cat Thursday'
Commenting on the High Pay Centre’s analysis of executive pay released today, (It’s Fat Cat Day - Thursday Jan 4 2018), Kate Andrews, News Editor at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“Driving down wages of top CEOs will not help the average worker, and will only cut the level of taxes collected by the Treasury. Intervention for the sake of public appearances is rarely a good idea.
“Decisions on pay should be left up to shareholders, who are in the best position to deem what is the appropriate level of pay for all employees given their vested interest. In our globalised economy high pay has merit, with CEOs’ roles becoming ever more important and high pressured as their decisions can make or break a company. Attempts by government to intervene in their remuneration seldom achieve their desired outcome.
“Again, the publicity around “Fat Cat Thursday” distracts us from the crucial issue of low pay and high living costs. Cutting salaries at the top by no means translates to an increase in pay for those at the bottom; salaries are not fixed, nor is value created in this way. If these campaigners are genuinely concerned about disparities in salaries, they would be better placed to concentrate on closing loopholes in the tax systems which benefit only high earners, and on lowering living costs across the board to make ordinary people’s earnings go further.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Stephanie Lis, Director of Communications: email@example.com or 0207 799 8909 or 07766 221 268
The Institute of Economic Affairs report on pay regulation And how much do you earn? can be downloaded here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems and seeks to provide analysis in order to improve the public understanding of economics.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
NIESR: GDP growth of 0.6 per cent in 2017Q411/01/2018 15:05:00
Our monthly estimates of GDP suggest that output grew by 0.6 per cent in the final quarter of 2017, an increase compared with the third quarter when the economy expanded by 0.4 per cent and the strongest quarterly growth estimate since the fourth quarter of 2016. Based on this, the UK economy expanded by 1.8 per cent in 2017.
Work Foundation - New research reveals the complex and strained relationship between productivity, technology and working anywhere09/01/2018 10:35:00
Today, a new report produced by Lancaster University’s Work Foundation and commissioned by Citrix, highlights the complex and often strained relationship between productivity, technology and work.
King's Fund - Response to the latest winter situation report from NHS England09/01/2018 09:35:00
Richard Murray, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund, commented on the latest winter situation report from NHS England
Adam Smith Inst - Outrage over executive pay is overegged04/01/2018 12:35:00
Following the High Pay Centre and CIPD's annual report on executive pay Sam Dumitriu, Head of Research at the Adam Smith Institute, finds little reason for outrage in the figures
IFS - Will the rising minimum wage lead to more low-paid jobs being automated?04/01/2018 11:35:00
For employees aged 25 or over, the legal minimum hourly wage – now termed the ‘national living wage’ (NLW) – has risen from £6.70 in 2015 to £7.50 now, will rise further to £7.83 in April, and is planned to reach 60% of median wages in 2020 – which, under current forecasts of wage growth, would be £8.56. More importantly, because this is a much faster rate of growth than for wages in general, this would mean that the fraction of employees aged 25+ subject to the minimum would have trebled in just five years, from 4% in 2015 to 12% in 2020.