IFG - Business as usual spells trouble on trade
The UK will only reap the benefits of taking back control of trade policy if government radically changes the way it operates.
Published yesterday by the Institute for Government (IfG), Taking Back Control of Trade Policy says that despite the creation of a new trade department, the civil service and ministers are not even close to being ready to negotiate – let alone implement – new global trading relationships.
The paper sets out the how the UK can become a powerful, independent player in international trade.
Authors argue that good trade policy requires civil servants to work across departments, collaborate with business, be open with consumers and the public and spend their careers developing deep knowledge and expertise. But this is not Whitehall’s normal way of doing business.
Ministers will have to make tricky choices about the country’s priorities and recognise there is much more to trade policy than making deals. They should avoid sinking resources into negotiations with the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) or the USA, prioritising instead the replication of existing EU deals with Canada, South Korea, Switzerland, Turkey and Singapore.
Jill Rutter, Brexit Programme Director at the Institute for Government said:
“Whitehall is not set up to do trade well. Not only does it currently lack the necessary expertise but its standard ways of working – generalist, secretive and unwilling to make difficult trade-offs – are all the enemies of doing trade policy well. Ministers will find that taking back control of trade also means taking back responsibility for some very difficult political choices – and they need to be ready to make and justify them.”
Oliver Ilott, Institute for Government Senior Researcher and report author, said:
“Trade policy is about much more than making deals. There is a real danger that the UK wastes its limited capacity launching trade negotiations with large numbers of countries, and either doing bad deals quickly or getting bogged down in protracted talks going nowhere. The government needs a strategy that targets a few priority countries and explores options that may be better than free trade agreements.”
For more information, please contact Nicole Valentinuzzi on 07850313791.
Notes to editors
- The report can be found here or attached. Further copies available upon request.
- The Institute for Government (IfG) is an independent think tank working to make government more effective
Latest News from
Adam Smith Inst - Government is right to continue Everything But Arms trade policy17/08/2017 13:35:00
With the release of the UK Government's briefing paper on future customs arrangements the Adam Smith Institute welcomes the government's continued support post-Brexit of the EU's current Everything But Arms initiative with Least Developed Countries. But we can go even further.
IFG - A customs deal is necessary but not sufficient for frictionless trade17/08/2017 12:35:00
A deal on customs is important to reducing post-Brexit trade friction, but a new paper from the Institute for Government argues that is only half the story.
JRF - Five million want more work or better jobs in UK’s biggest cities17/08/2017 11:35:00
Over five million people want to work, want more hours or are trapped in low paid and insecure work across the UK’s 12 biggest cities, according to new report.
NEF - New research: More than half of self-employed not earning a decent living17/08/2017 10:35:00
More than half of all self-employed people are failing to earn a decent living, according to new research by the New Economics Foundation.