IFG - Business as usual spells trouble on trade
The UK will only reap the benefits of taking back control of trade policy if government radically changes the way it operates.
Published yesterday by the Institute for Government (IfG), Taking Back Control of Trade Policy says that despite the creation of a new trade department, the civil service and ministers are not even close to being ready to negotiate – let alone implement – new global trading relationships.
The paper sets out the how the UK can become a powerful, independent player in international trade.
Authors argue that good trade policy requires civil servants to work across departments, collaborate with business, be open with consumers and the public and spend their careers developing deep knowledge and expertise. But this is not Whitehall’s normal way of doing business.
Ministers will have to make tricky choices about the country’s priorities and recognise there is much more to trade policy than making deals. They should avoid sinking resources into negotiations with the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) or the USA, prioritising instead the replication of existing EU deals with Canada, South Korea, Switzerland, Turkey and Singapore.
Jill Rutter, Brexit Programme Director at the Institute for Government said:
“Whitehall is not set up to do trade well. Not only does it currently lack the necessary expertise but its standard ways of working – generalist, secretive and unwilling to make difficult trade-offs – are all the enemies of doing trade policy well. Ministers will find that taking back control of trade also means taking back responsibility for some very difficult political choices – and they need to be ready to make and justify them.”
Oliver Ilott, Institute for Government Senior Researcher and report author, said:
“Trade policy is about much more than making deals. There is a real danger that the UK wastes its limited capacity launching trade negotiations with large numbers of countries, and either doing bad deals quickly or getting bogged down in protracted talks going nowhere. The government needs a strategy that targets a few priority countries and explores options that may be better than free trade agreements.”
For more information, please contact Nicole Valentinuzzi on 07850313791.
Notes to editors
- The report can be found here or attached. Further copies available upon request.
- The Institute for Government (IfG) is an independent think tank working to make government more effective
Latest News from
NIESR: UK’s obsession with housing wealth could be making the country poorer16/11/2017 11:05:00
Favourable public policy treatment of home ownership means mortgages are crowding out other forms of long term savings and investment, with potentially significant repercussions for individual pension savings but also for the UK economy as a whole, new NIESR research for the Association of British Insurers revealed yesterday.
JRF - Single-earner families face living standards drop16/11/2017 10:35:00
Cuts to Universal Credit will leave many low income families worse off despite tax changes and a rising National Living Wage, new analysis for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has revealed.
IEA - Decision on minimum alcohol pricing disappointing & will hit poorest the hardest16/11/2017 09:35:00
IEA reacts to Supreme Court ruling on minimum alcohol pricing in Scotland
NIESR: Head of UK Macroeconomic Forecasting reacts to the latest CPI inflation data released today15/11/2017 14:20:00
NIESR’s Head of UK Macroeconomic Forecasting, Amit Kara yesterday reacted to the latest CPI inflation data released.
Adam Smith Inst - Time to update employment law14/11/2017 16:35:00
Sam Dumitriu, Research Economist at the Adam Smith Institute commented on the news that Uber have lost their employment tribunal appeal and that Uber drivers will be classified as workers and entitled to sick pay, holiday pay and the minimum wage