IFG - Johnson's reforms to role of special advisers disempowering ministers
Boris Johnson’s changes to the role of special advisers (SpAds) are disempowering ministers and undermining the quality of government decision making, says a new report by the Institute for Government.
Special Advisers and the Johnson Government: How the prime minister and his team are changing the role also says that the increased powers and responsibilities handed to certain SpAds, including Dominic Cummings, the prime minister’s chief adviser, require increased scrutiny. The report says Johnson should accept requests from parliamentary select committees for Cummings to appear as a witness.
Drawing on extensive interviews with current and former special advisers, civil servants and former secretaries of state, the report assesses the increased responsibilities handed to Cummings and David Frost, Johnson’s chief Brexit negotiator, the effect of greater No.10 oversight of advisers’ appointment, and the way many SpAds now report directly to the prime minister’s team as well as their secretary of state.
Closer No.10 control over advisers has helped the Johnson government SpAds to focus on the prime minister’s priorities, particularly compared to the dysfunction of Theresa May’s time as prime minister when advisers had to deal with a cabinet split into warring factions. But greater No.10 control brings the risk that ministers lose a trusted source of advice and the range of views in government is narrowed. The report also calls on the government to overhaul what has for too long, under many different governments, been an amateur approach to induction, support and management of special advisers. Given that this job is so crucial to ministers, taking the time to explain to advisers how to be effective will pay dividends for the government.
The report recommends that:
- No.10 allows ministers to choose their own advisers – subject to the prime minister’s approval – rather than imposing its own candidates
- Ministers agree to requests for powerful and high-profile special advisers to appear in front of select committees
- The prime minister urgently modernises how special advisers are supported so that they can be far more effective in what is a critical job in government.
Tim Durrant, IfG associate director and author of the report, said:
“Special advisers play an essential role in any government and Boris Johnson’s administration is no different. But the way that special advisers work with No.10, and No.10’s approach to the hiring and firing of advisers, risks undermining the close relationship between a minister and their advisers. Rather than seeking to control everything that advisers do, No.10 should support them in their role as trusted members of ministers’ teams.”
Notes to editors
Latest News from
JRF - Coalition warns it would be a terrible mistake to cut the £20 uplift to Universal Credit01/12/2020 10:35:00
Over 60 organisations and bishops issue a public statement expressing their deep concern at the failure of the Government to announce that they are making the £20 uplift to Universal Credit permanent and extending it to legacy benefits.
Evidence used to justify hospitality closures is “tenuous,” says IEA research01/12/2020 09:35:00
Research from the Institute of Economic Affairs, authored by Head of Lifestyle Economics Christopher Snowdon, casts doubt over the relevance of evidence on which Tier 2 and Tier 3 restrictions on the hospitality sector will be based.
The Spending Review is 'unlikely to be enough to address health and care pressures': The King's Fund responds to the Spending Review26/11/2020 14:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
Initial reaction from IFS researchers on Spending Review 2020 and OBR forecasts26/11/2020 13:35:00
IFS Director Paul Johnson says: “Rishi Sunak has been spending truly astonishing amounts of money this year and plans to continue to do so next year in response to Covid.
Spending Review 2020: IPPR response26/11/2020 12:35:00
Spending review misunderstands 'basic economics' and will leave economy needlessly damaged
Rishi cannot tax our way out of debt or spend our way out of a recession — Adam Smith Institute26/11/2020 11:35:00
Following the spending review by the Chancellor, the Adam Smith Institute’s Deputy Director Matt Kilcoyne criticises the public sector spending splurge
Chancellor’s words ring hollow as less is spent on levelling up - JRF26/11/2020 10:35:00
Helen Barnard, Director of the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
IEA - The Chancellor’s diagnosis was correct but “the medicine is inadequate”26/11/2020 09:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at the free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review