IFS - £12 billion needed if government wants to maintain value of household support package
The government would need to find £12 billion simply to achieve what it was aiming to do with the £24 billion package announced in May. That’s largely because in May energy prices were expected to rise by 95% in 2022/23, and are now expected to rise by 141%.
This is a new finding from analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, funded by the Nuffield Foundation as part of the forthcoming IFS Green Budget.
Given expectations in May, out-of-work benefit recipients looked set to be broadly protected from rising prices. But under the latest inflation forecasts, out of work working-age benefit claimants are now on course to see a fall in their real income of £620 over the course of the year. Doubling the current £650 grant to those on benefits would protect them on average, as well as helping low income pensioners and families in work, at a cost of roughly £5½ billion.
Similarly, back in May it looked like the £400 energy discount and £150 council tax rebate would cover around half of the increase in energy costs for a typical family over the year. If the government wants to continue to cover half the cost of increased bills support would need to be increased by a further £260 at a cost of around another £7bn.
There is a difficult judgment here. Extra spending of this magnitude, funded by further borrowing, could add to the inflationary pressures in the economy. With energy prices and inflation set to remain high next year it seems almost inevitable that at least some of the extra spending will be maintained beyond this fiscal year.
Other findings include:
- Because poorer households tend to spend more of their budgets on energy, the inflation rates they are experiencing are accelerating even faster than those faced by other households. The poorest fifth will face an eye-watering 18% inflation rate in October, compared to 11% for the richest fifth.
- The new energy price cap takes effect in October. Because benefits are increased each April in line with inflation the previous September, benefits are set once again to fail to keep up with actual increases in the cost of living. The government should permanently change the way that it compensates benefit recipients for inflation such that benefits rise by the expected April rate rather than rate from previous September that is used at present. Otherwise in April, the real value of benefits will be 7% lower than they were pre-pandemic.
Paul Johnson, IFS Director, said:
“The government is still playing catch up as inflation and the cost of energy continue to spiral upwards. Just achieving what they wanted to achieve back in May will cost an additional £12 billion, and a package on that scale will still leave many households much worse off. Given the costs there are genuine and difficult trade-offs here. For both households managing their budgets and the government managing the economy’s finances some clarity on strategy is urgently needed.”
Alex Beer, Welfare Programme Head at the Nuffield Foundation said:
“As prices of essentials including food, heating and fuel continue to rise, families on low-incomes are facing more uncertainty and pressures. Many of these families were struggling to get by even before the current crisis and are not helped by the rollercoaster real value of Universal Credit payments, and short-term fixes to help benefit claimants. The government needs to make clear the actions it will take to help these families, by providing them not only with more security now, but greater certainty in the medium term.”
Latest News from
IEA Director General responds to Kwasi Kwarteng’s conference speech04/10/2022 11:25:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responds to Kwasi Kwarteng’s conference speech
JRF in Scotland asks what more evidence governments need to target help at those who need it most as huge survey reveals a nation in ‘crisis-mode’03/10/2022 10:25:00
Joseph Rowntree Foundation in Scotland asks what more evidence governments need to target help at those who need it most as huge survey reveals a nation in ‘crisis-mode’
IEA - The Shadow Chancellor’s policy agenda was disappointing and predictable28/09/2022 11:25:00
Matthew Lesh, head of public policy at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs comments on Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ speech at the Labour Party’s annual conference
IEA comments ahead of Friday’s mini budget: “an opportunity to reset the agenda”22/09/2022 09:20:00
Matthew Lesh, Head of Public Policy at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs comments ahead of this Friday’s fiscal event
IEA expert responds to Energy Bill Relief Scheme for businesses21/09/2022 16:20:00
Andy Mayer, Chief Operating Officer and energy analyst at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs comments on the announcement of the Energy Bill Relief Scheme
UK business investment fell to lowest rate in the G7 after corporation tax cut to 19 per cent, IPPR finds21/09/2022 11:15:00
The UK had the lowest rate of business investment of any G7 economy in 2019, according to new analysis by IPPR of OECD figures, despite also having the lowest corporation tax rate for the previous two decades. The tax on companies’ profits was reduced to 19 per cent, its lowest level this century, in 2017.
Dip in inflation shouldn’t let the Bank of England off the hook, says IEA expert14/09/2022 14:05:00
Julian Jessop, economics fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest ONS inflation figures
IPPR responds to inflation figures14/09/2022 13:05:00
Dr George Dibb, head of the Centre for Economic Justice at IPPR, responded to the ONS August CPI figures