IFS - Around half of TV adverts for food and drink seen by children are for foods and drinks high in fat, salt or sugar or for fast food restaurants
Since 2007 it has not been permitted to advertise food and drink that is high in fat, salt or sugar during children's television programmes. Evidence from Ofcom suggests that in 2016 children spent 64% of their viewing time watching programmes outside children’s programming.
Recent discussion around the possibility of a second wave of the Government’s childhood obesity strategy has included calls from health campaigners and leaders of all the main opposition parties to extend current restrictions on when food and drink products that are high in fat, salt or sugar can be advertised to cover all pre-watershed advertising.
In a new briefing note, IFS researchers show that half of the television advertising for food and drink that children saw in 2015 was for products that are high in fat, sugar or salt or for restaurants and bars (the majority of which are fast food outlets), and that a large portion of this advertising takes place prior to the watershed.
Key findings include:
- In 2015, 87% of the television advertising for food and drinks seen by children (4-15) was during non-children’s programming.
- 50% of the television advertising for food and drink that children saw was for food and drink that is high in fat, salt or sugar (HFSS) or was for restaurants and bars. 39% of this was for HFSS food and drink products and 11% was for restaurants and bars, the majority of which are fast food outlets.
- Of the television advertising that was for HFSS food and drink products or restaurants and bars, 70% of the advertising took place prior to the 9pm watershed. Extending restrictions to cover pre watershed programming would have affected advertising of products high in fat, salt and sugar. Adverts for restaurants and bars would be restricted if they featured products high in fat, salt and sugar.
Rebekah Stroud, a Research Economist at IFS and co-author of the briefing note, said:
“Current restrictions ban the advertising of food and drink high in fat, salt and sugar during children’s programming. However, a lot of the TV advertising that children see is not during children’s programming, leading to calls to extend the ban to all advertising before the watershed. In 2015, up to 35% of the TV adverts for food and drink that children saw would have been directly affected had restrictions applied before the watershed.”
Notes to editors:
- The Briefing Note ‘Children’s exposure to TV advertising of food and drink’, by Rachel Griffith, Martin O’Connell, Kate Smith and Rebekah Stroud, is available at: Children’s exposure to TV advertising of food and drink
Please contact Tom Jeffery - firstname.lastname@example.org / 020 7291 4800 / 07730 667013, if you have any queries.
- The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council (ERC) under ERC-2015-AdG-694822, the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) under the Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), ES/M010147/1, and the Open Research Area, ES/N011562/1, and the British Academy under pf160093. Data supplied by TNS UK Limited, AC Nielsen and the Broadcasters Audience Research Board (BARB). The use of TNS UK Ltd., AC Nielsen and BARB data in this work does not imply the endorsement of either TNS UK Ltd. or AC Nielsen or BARB in relation to the interpretation or analysis of the data. All errors and omissions remained the responsibility of the authors.
Latest News from
IEA - End airline slot giveaway to lower fares, improve consumer choice and help the environment - new paper argues27/05/2022 16:05:00
Central planning of airline take-off and landing slot allocation is driving up costs for consumers and incentivising airlines to run ‘ghost’ flights, warns the Institute of Economic Affairs
Chancellor’s announcement is significant but piecemeal measures only add to anxiety for insecure workers27/05/2022 15:05:00
Ben Harrison, Director of the Work Foundation at Lancaster University, responded to the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s cost of living announcement on 26 May 2022
Sunak is ‘belatedly rising to cost of living challenge’ but leaves millions of families uncertain of future, says IPPR27/05/2022 14:05:00
Think tank welcomes government’s “commonsense U-turn" on windfall tax, but says tax breaks for North Sea investment point in wrong direction
JRF - Relief for low-income families as help targets those in need27/05/2022 13:05:00
JRF responds to Chancellor’s measures on the cost of living.
IEA responds to Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s statement27/05/2022 12:05:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s ‘Economy and Cost of Living Statement’
Targeted Support and Tax Grabs: ASI Responds to the Chancellor's Announcement on Cost of Living Relief Measures27/05/2022 10:15:00
Morgan Schondelmeier Director of Operations at the Adam Smith Institute responds to the Chancellor’s Statement on the Cost of Living.
Work Foundation - New Work Foundation Index reveals UK workers suffering most from insecure employment26/05/2022 12:25:00
New in-depth analysis of UK job market data reveals women, disabled people, ethnic minorities and young workers have been consistently trapped in insecure employment over the last twenty years.
IEA - Government should go further in liberalising GMO regulations26/05/2022 09:25:00
Matthew Lesh, IEA Head of Public Policy commented on upcoming legislation to speed up the development and marketing of “gene-edited” crops
IEA - Police training should focus on implementing the rule of law, not identity politics25/05/2022 15:10:00
Marc Glendening, Head of Cultural Affairs at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the National Police Chiefs Council plan to impose the mandatory teaching of ‘black history’ upon every officer as part of a Race Action Plan
IFS - Inflation for poorest households likely to increase even faster than for the richest, and could hit 14% in October25/05/2022 12:20:00
In April 2022 Ofgem’s tariff cap increased by 54%, or nearly £700 per year for an average household. Yesterday the CEO of Ofgem said that Ofgem expect the default tariff cap to increase by another £800 in October, leading to a cap of £2,800 on average annual gas and electricity bills.