IPPR - Make social care free and save NHS £4.5 billion a year, says think tank
Free care for all over-65s would remove fears about savings for millions and put dementia patients on same footing as those with cancer
Introducing free social care for everyone over 65 would save the NHS in England £4.5 billion a year by enabling more elderly people to receive care in the community, according to a leading think tank.
Millions of people should be spared the risk of high costs in old age by providing social care free at the point of need, just like health care, IPPR recommends in a report recently published.
Under IPPR’s proposal, older people who could afford to would still pay for their own accommodation costs but not for personal care, no matter where they receive it. The reform – similar to the system already in place in Scotland – would more than double the number of people receiving state-funded care.
The report argues that the change would:
- Create parity between cancer patients, whose care is all free from the NHS, and those with dementia, many of whom must pay for all their care.
- Increase the number of people with access to state-funded care from 185,000 to 440,000 (if it was delivered and fully taken up today), reducing unmet need and relieving pressure on unpaid informal carers.
- Help shift hospital patients back into the community, and deliver a higher quality and better integrated service, resulting in potential savings to the NHS of up to £4.5bn per year.
Acknowledging the extra investment needed to provide free social care, the report notes that spending on adult social care for the over 65s would rise from £17bn a year today to £36bn in 2030, before NHS and other savings are factored in. However, £11 billion of that increase would arise even within the existing system because of the growing elderly population, and there would be benefits to the wider economy, including jobs for the estimated 70,000 new full-time workers needed to meet current demand.
The report argues that free social care for the elderly should be funded from higher taxes, with a rise of two percentage points in income tax needed. Recent polling in England by the charity Independent Age, cited in the report, found 74 per cent of adults supported free personal care for everyone who needs it, with 69 per cent willing to pay more tax for this.
IPPR also calls for simultaneous reforms to the way social care is commissioned and delivered in order to provide a more “joined-up” system of health and social care provision for older people with complex needs. It suggests a system of integrated health and care commissioners under which GPs, nurses, mental health workers and social care workers would work locally in integrated teams.
The report follows three decades of indecision over social care reform by a series of recent governments, and comes ahead of a long overdue consultative Green Paper on social care, originally promised for early last year.
It comes as spending on social care has fallen by more than 10 per cent over the last decade as a result of the squeeze on local authority budgets. The report cites 1.4 million over-65s with unmet social care needs, increasing strains on quality and safety as measured by the CQC, and the growing problem of private sector care providers at risk of closure – a problem reported by two thirds of councils over a six-month period.
Harry Quilter-Pinner, Senior Research Fellow at IPPR and lead author of the report, said:
“If you develop cancer in England you are cared for by the NHS, free at the point of need for as long as it takes, but if you develop dementia you’re likely to have to pay for all your own social care - running up potentially catastrophic costs in the last years of your life. This makes no sense.”
“By investing in personal social care so it is free at the point of need for everyone over 65, we can provide a better and more integrated care system, one that’s fairer to us all and saves the NHS £4.5 billion a year.”
Dean Hochlaf, IPPR Researcher and co-author of the report, said:
“Over the next decade the number of older people in the UK is set to grow substantially. This will bring with it more people facing diseases of ageing such as dementia, as well as higher levels of frailty. We need a social care system that is fit for purpose.
“Adding a penny or two to tax is a small price to pay for creating a simpler, joined-up system in which we collectively contribute to the costs that many of us and our relatives will otherwise face.”
Sir David Behan, chair of Health Education England and former chief executive of the Care Quality Commission, said:
"In 1948, politicians were brave in making the NHS free at the point of need and funded out of general taxation. We need our politicians today to be just as courageous and do the same for social care. After all, the hallmark of a civilised society is how well we treat the most vulnerable, including our elderly parents and grandparents. At the moment we are failing them but it doesn't have to be that way."
NOTES TO EDITORS
- The IPPR paper, Social Care Free at the Point of Need: The case for free personal care in England by Harry Quilter-Pinner and Dean Hochlaf, is available at: http://www.ippr.org/research/publications/social-care-free-at-the-point-of-need
- The NHS savings figure (£4.5bn per year by 2030) from the introduction of free personal care is derived from a number of sources. The most significant is reform of NHS continuing healthcare – no longer needed as all people would receive free social care – which could deliver an annual saving of up to £2 billion a year, rising to £3.3 billion by 2030/31. Further savings would come from reducing admissions to hospital (£270 million per year); from matching the Netherlands which is the best performer in Europe for end of life care in the community (£267 million per year); and from reducing both delayed transfers of care and unnecessary hospital stays by those who are medically fit for discharge (£670 million per year).
- Details of Independent Age’s polling can be found here: https://www.independentage.org/news-media/press-releases/three-quarters-of-adults-england-back-free-personal-care-for-over-65s
- IPPR is the UK’s pre-eminent progressive think tank. With more than 40 staff in offices in London, Manchester, Newcastle and Edinburgh, IPPR is Britain’s only national think tank with a truly national presence.
Latest News from
Reward farmers who help fight climate and nature crisis, urges IPPR think tank13/05/2021 14:35:00
Now the UK has left the EU’s agricultural schemes, the government should seize the opportunity to transform farming to protect the environment and secure the livelihoods of farmers, according to a new IPPR report.
IEA - Nanny statists have “exploited” this pandemic, says new research13/05/2021 13:35:00
Governments are increasingly adopting higher sin taxes and more prohibitions, finds the 2021 Nanny State Index
IFS - Elective hospital admissions dropped by a third last year, while outpatient appointments and non-COVID emergency admissions each fell by a fifth13/05/2021 12:35:00
New analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Harvard University and Imperial College London shows there were 2.9 million fewer planned admissions, 1.2 million fewer non-COVID-19 emergency inpatient admissions and 17.1 million fewer outpatient appointments between March and December 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.
Policy needs to adjust following encouraging GDP data, says IEA expert13/05/2021 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest GDP and trade data from the Office for National Statistics
Queen's speech: IPPR reaction to ‘policy gulf’ on environment, planning, health and care agenda13/05/2021 10:35:00
Think tank welcomes some targets and commitments, but says bold action and clear policy must follow
Ill-considered ‘junk food’ ad ban “has to be binned”, says IEA expert13/05/2021 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responded to renewed government plans to ban ‘junk food’ advertising
Adam Smith Inst - "Nutty nanny statism": Government plans to ban 'junk food' advertising online and after 9.00pm11/05/2021 16:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute’s Head of Research Matthew Lesh responded to the Government maintaining plans to ban so-called ‘junk food’ from online advertising and before 9.00pm on television
“Unlikely to supercharge economic growth”: IEA experts respond to Queen’s Speech11/05/2021 15:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Queen’s Speech
JRF - Queen’s Speech: Where is the Employment Bill for low-paid workers?11/05/2021 14:35:00
JRF responds to today's Queen's Speech
The apprenticeship levy should be scrapped completely, says IEA expert11/05/2021 13:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the news that £1bn of apprenticeship levy funds has gone unspent in the nine months since last May